Publications

Keeping It Flowing: 10 Steps to Anticipate Citizens’ Challenges to New Developments

Published:

December 7, 2016

Author(s):

Harvey L. Morrison, QC, Partner at McInnes Cooper
Doug Tupper, QC, Retired Partner at McInnes Cooper

Recently, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court denied a motion for a temporary stay of proceedings to prevent the deployment of certain tidal devices in Nova Scotia’s Minas Basin. In Bay of Fundy Inshore Fisherman’s Association v. Nova Scotia (Environment), the court held the Fishermen’s Association, which had sought the stay, had failed to prove that irreparable harm would result if deployment of the experimental tidal devices were allowed to proceed immediately. McInnes Cooper’s Doug Tupper, QC and Harvey Morrison QC represented the successful tidal power proponent.

We are living in a world of increasing change, with the rapid development of new ideas and proposed new industries. The list of examples keeps growing: tidal devices, wind turbines, fracking, aquaculture, gas storage, drones, redevelopment or elimination of dams, and more. Each of these involve new developments that could impact the status quo. Federal, provincial and municipal governments are making decisions on how the development of these changes should be regulated. Citizens and citizen groups who oppose the proposed developments are increasingly challenging those decisions and the processes leading to them.

There is a constitutional requirement for a duty to consult in the Aboriginal context. In specific statutes, there may be some duties to consult other groups. Where governments have made promises of consultation, courts in some cases have recognized duties of some reasonable consultation.

Today’s government decisions are typically being challenged by judicial review, and in certain cases, statutory appeals, and by stays of proceeding and injunctions. Judicial reviews and statutory appeals are processes whereby the decisions of government authorities, such as licensing, granting of permits with conditions, and so on, are being opposed and courts are being asked to quash those decisions. Stays of proceedings and injunctions are being requested in the courts to hold developments up pending applications for judicial review and statutory appeals, and in some cases, permanent injunctions are being requested to end proposed new developments.

Here are 10 steps for developers to consider to be prepared for these anticipated citizen challenges.

Assume the proposed development will be challenged, and build that expectation into the planning.

Plan and budget accordingly for all the time and expense necessary to meet the anticipated challenges.

In a ‘clear eyed’ manner, ask who might be affected and how. Anticipate the concerns of those who may be affected. Be realistic.

Plan how to address these anticipated concerns. Hire the expertise that will be necessary early in the process. Consider seeking public relations advice in certain circumstances. And consider hiring legal counsel early in the development process. They can assist in identifying areas susceptible to challenge, in dealing with regulatory authorities, and in representing your interests, if legal challenges are ultimately made.

Identify the influential leaders among the citizens, and citizen groups, probably affected.

Communicate with those citizens and the citizen groups as soon as possible, but only when properly prepared to do so.

The communication should be constant, transparent, and sincere.

Respond to articles, including incorrect statements in the public domain, when appropriate. Do not abandon the field to others, and do not assume your silence will suffice.

Engage fully with the applicable regulatory authorities. Provide complete responses in writing when requested to do so. Document and record interactions with the various regulatory authorities. Remember that all communications will be subject to later disclosure, if there are challenges.

Maintain a professional and respectful relationship with the regulatory authorities, at all times. They are not the ‘enemy’.

Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Energy & Natural Resources Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue

McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2016. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

Keeping It Flowing: 10 Steps to Anticipate Citizens’ Challenges to New Developments

Published:

Author(s):

Share

Share

Related Lawyers

Harvey Morrison, QC

Related Services

Related Industries

Related Publications

Hiring a Foreign Company to Provide Services in Canada? 3 Immigration Issues

The Duty to Consult Indigenous Groups: 5 FAQs

Dutch Court Orders Corporation to Reduce Emissions in Landmark Decision

R. v. Desautel: Canadian Constitution Protects Non-Citizen Aboriginal People

The N.S. Shared Solar Energy Program: 3 Key Facts

The Indigenous Right to a Moderate Livelihood: A Need for Clarity

Using Social Media Influencer Marketing: 6 Legal Tips

What’s the Deal? Creating, Interpreting & Enforcing Electronic Contracts

Playing it Safe: Employer Obligations To Employees Working From Home

Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller: One-Sided Standard Form Clauses May Be Unenforceable

Top 5 Legal Considerations When Launching a FINTECH Startup

Coping with COVID-19: The Impact on Contractual Performance in the Energy and Natural Resources Sector

N.S. Battens Down Marine Renewable Energy Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

5 Key Requirements of Canada’s Federal Environmental Emergency Regulations

Digital Privacy Act Mandatory Data Breach Response Obligations: 5 Key Focus Areas For Your Compliance Plan

The Digital Privacy Act: 5 FAQs About the Mandatory Data Breach Response Obligations Effective November 1, 2018

10 Key Terms to Make Clear in Every Software Licensing Agreement

Dan Watt in Energy Regulation Quarterly | The Impact Assessment Act, Canadian Energy Regulator Act and Offshore Energy: A View from Atlantic Canada

The Evolving Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: N.S. Court Recognizes a “Duty of Enforcement Consultation” in R. v. Martin

Defining the Boundaries: Protecting Privacy & Privilege of Digital Content @ the Canadian Border

Jurisdiction Over Internet Defamation: Same Law, Different Facts in Haaretz v. Goldhar

The Global Talent Stream: 5 Practical Learnings About the Latest Immigration Star

More Valuable Than Money? The 5 Most Common Equity Compensation Plans

The Feds Finally Take the Plunge: Bill C-69 & The New Federal Offshore Renewable Energy Regime

Bill C-69 & the New Federal Impact Assessment Act: The Impact on the Role of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB)

Navigating the N.S. Marine Renewable Energy Regime: What Project Developers Need to Know

Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada: Crown Breached Fiduciary Duty to Indigenous Community – in 1858

The Legal Reality: Canadian Appeal Court decides “Virtual Presence” is enough for production order for user information against non-Canadian company in British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Brecknell

Balance Between Public & Operator Interests in Offshore Petroleum Resources Data is Set: Supreme Court of Canada Won’t Hear Appeal in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

It’s Official: “Facilitation Payments” to Foreign Public Officials Violates Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA)

10 Legal Considerations When Incorporating Your Startup

New Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations Effective November 1, 2017: Key Changes to the Offshore Regime

Supreme Court of Canada Tackles Freedom of Religion & the Duty to Consult in Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)

Protect Your Assets: 3 Best Practices for Intellectual Property (IP) Owners

Canada Has Other Fish to Fry Between NAFTA Negotiation Rounds: CETA Provisionally Effective September 21, 2017

New N.S. Demonstration Permit for Marine Renewable Energy in the Wind (and the Waves) With Proposed Marine Renewable Energy Act Amendments

Charting a Course for Good Governance of Canada’s Emerging Ocean Economy | Offshore Aquaculture and Ocean-based Renewable Energy

Cross-Border Caution: 5 Anti-Corruption Law Compliance Program Tips

Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo Services Inc. and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc.: Crown Can Rely on National Energy Board to Fulfill its Duty to Consult

The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions in Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v. York University

Steering clear of personal liability for oppression: Supreme Court of Canada offers guidance to corporate leaders in Wilson v. Alharayeri

Growing Your Business: 3 Structuring Solutions

Making Waves: What CETA means for Atlantic Canadian Fisheries

Go Global @ Home: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Global Order to Remove Internet Content in Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc.

Like it or Not: Supreme Court of Canada decides class action against Facebook can go ahead in B.C. – despite its terms of use in Douez v. Facebook, Inc.

An Early Canada (Anti Spam Legislation) Day Gift! CASL Private Right of Action Repealed

Canada v. Mikisew Cree First Nation: Court to Decide Whether Duty to Consult Also Applies Before Legislation is Enacted

Northern Exposure: Anti-Corruption Law Exposes Payments to Governments Under Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (ESTMA)

Appeal Court maintains balance between public & operator interests in offshore petroleum resources data in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

Cannabis Legalization in Canada: Seeds have sprouted, but the branches are still bare

Nip it in the Bud: A 5 Step Plan for Employers to Prepare for Cannabis Legalization in Canada

Daniel Watt and Sara Mahaney in Gard Update: Legal privilege in the corporate context in Canada

Register Before You Lobby in N.B. under Lobbyists’ Registration Act

McInnes Cooper in the Maritimes Energy Association’s Member News | Go Deep: How International Legal Reform Can Prevent Legal Uncertainty from Hindering Offshore Wind & Aquaculture Growth

Go Deep: How International Legal Reform Can Prevent Legal Uncertainty from Hindering Offshore Wind & Aquaculture Growth

Follow These 5 Steps for Compliant Disclosure on Social Media

Information Technology (IT) Contracts: 3 Key Lessons for Customers and Service Providers in Atos v Sapient

Available now: Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Best Practices

Cyber Security: A 5-Step Data Breach Risk Mitigation Plan for Corporate Boards & Directors

Confidentiality Risks of Doing Business With the Public Sector Just Got Riskier: Completed NS Access to Information Requests Go Online

The Atlantic Link: 5 Key Questions About the Electrifying Opportunity to Connect to a New Renewable Energy Market

The Top Three Atlantic Canada Offshore Legal Developments of 2016

Time to Shine: Nova Scotia to Launch Solar Energy Pilot Program in 2017

Supreme Court of Canada Warns Judgment Creditors: Implied Consent is Enough to Disclose Discharge Statement in Royal Bank of Canada v. Trang

Public & operator interests in offshore petroleum resources data: Where will the balance be struck? in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation