Publications

Supreme Court of Canada Decides Indian Bands Assessing Leased Reserve Lands for Property Tax Purposes Can’t Have it Both Ways in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review)

Published:

September 12, 2016

Author(s):

Michael Crosbie, QC

On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band assessing the value of leased reserve lands for property tax purposes under its authority to tax reserve lands pursuant to a band by-law is still subject to the “highest and best use” (or HABU) principle, a basic principle of Canadian assessment law. And the use restriction in the lease was still placed “by the band” even though the Indian Act necessitated that the Band could only place it through the Crown’s intervention. Though the decision is a relatively specific exercise in interpreting the particular wording of a band by-law, the Court’s confirmation that the Highest and Best [legally permitted] Use (or HABU) is a basic principle of Canadian assessment law is of some interest beyond BC.

In 1957, the Musqueam Indian Band surrendered a portion of its reserve lands for lease to the Shaughnessy Golf and Country Club. Technically, however, the Indian Act mandated that the Band could only surrender the reserve lands to the federal Crown, which then entered into the lease to the Club on the Band’s behalf. Beginning in 1991, the Band exercises its right to tax, including to assess for tax purposes, its reserve lands under the Musqueam Indian Band Property Assessment Bylaw. In 1996, the Band amended the Bylaw to permit a property tax assessor to consider “any restriction placed on the use of the land and improvements by the band” instead of restrictions imposed by “an interest holder” when determining the property value for taxation purposes. Since then, the Band’s assessor consistently assessed the value based on use of the property as a golf and country club because the lease restricts the use to this purpose. But in 2011 the Band challenged this assessment before a review board, claiming the lands should be valued as residential and the lease’s use restriction wasn’t placed “by the band” because the lease was between the Crown and the Club. The Supreme Court of Canada, in a particularly short decision, disagreed:

The “highest and best use” principle applies. In a 1996 BC case, the BC Supreme Court decided the assessment of leasehold interests in Crown lands must be based on the actual value of the lands and improvements as if the occupier owned, rather than merely leased, them. But this led to an unfair result: a tenant of Crown land could be required to pay municipal property tax based on a use that the lease didn’t allow. BC legislation subsequently corrected this unfairness. In this case, the Band argued that the property used as a golf club should be assessed based on a possible, higher value use for residential purposes – a use that the lease, binding on the property, didn’t permit. This would result in a similar unfairness. The Court applied established legal principles and concluded that the Band’s position was incorrect, and the assessor was entitled to assess the golf club property based on its current use as a golf club – and not some potential future use as a residential property.

There was a restriction placed “by the band” when the Crown limited the use of the leased reserve land to that of a golf club. The legal mechanism the Indian Act necessitated to enable a lease to the Club (first a surrender of the land to the Crown for the purpose of leasing followed by a lease by the Crown to the Club) supported the conclusion that the Band itself placed the use restriction on the land because “the only way” the Band could have placed the use restriction in the lease was “through the Crown’s intervention.”

Though the decision is a relatively specific exercise in interpreting the particular wording of a band by-law, the Court’s comments about assessment law are of some interest beyond BC. The Court confirmed that Highest and Best [legally permitted] Use (or HABU) is a basic principle of Canadian assessment law. HABU is a basic first step in all property assessments in Atlantic Canada. Assessment based on current use rather than speculative potential use (unless the alternative use is a better than 50% probability) is the approach to property tax assessment in Atlantic Canada. For example, property used as a golf club is generally assessed based on use as a golf club and not on some alternative residential or commercial use. In Atlantic Canada, restrictions concerning the use of real property, which restrictions are binding upon that property’s title, are considered when a property is being assessed for property tax purposes.

Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Real Estate Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.

McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2016. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

Supreme Court of Canada Decides Indian Bands Assessing Leased Reserve Lands for Property Tax Purposes Can’t Have it Both Ways in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review)

Published:

Author(s):

Share

Share

Related Lawyers

Michael Crosbie, QC

Related Services

Related Industries

Related Publications

10 Key Realtor FAQs About N.B. Real Estate Law

NS Environmental Goals & Climate Change Reduction Act: In Pursuit of Sustainable Prosperity

Commercial Real Estate Investing in Atlantic Canada: 10 Key Legal Considerations

NB Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reduction Regulation: 5 Key Obligations

Slippery Snowbanks & Municipal Liability: When is a Policy Not a Policy?

Webinar | Growing Out Atlantic Canada’s Aquaculture Industry

N.B. Construction Remedies Act: 7 Key Changes from the Mechanics’ Lien Act

Hiring a Foreign Company to Provide Services in Canada? 3 Immigration Issues

Limited Options: New Employee Stock Option Tax Rules Effective July 1, 2021

The Duty to Consult Indigenous Groups: 5 FAQs

Dutch Court Orders Corporation to Reduce Emissions in Landmark Decision

R. v. Desautel: Canadian Constitution Protects Non-Citizen Aboriginal People

The N.S. Shared Solar Energy Program: 3 Key Facts

Tax Implications of Working from Home During COVID-19: 10 Employer FAQs

Estate Planning: Two Trust Solutions

CCDC 2 (2020): 8 Key Changes to the Stipulated Price Contract

The Indigenous Right to a Moderate Livelihood: A Need for Clarity

New Trust Reporting Requirements Effective for 2021 Tax Year

Coping with COVID-19: Canada’s Federal & Provincial Economic Response Plans

Coping with COVID-19: The Impact on Contractual Performance in the Energy and Natural Resources Sector

N.S. Battens Down Marine Renewable Energy Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

Prompt Payment Coming Down the Pike in NS: What Owners & Contractors Must Know

Still an Option: Feds Delay New Tax Rules for Employee Stock Options

5 Key Requirements of Canada’s Federal Environmental Emergency Regulations

5 Reasons to Transition Immigrant Physicians to Canadian Permanent Residence Status & 3 Key Paths to Get There

Dan Watt in Energy Regulation Quarterly | The Impact Assessment Act, Canadian Energy Regulator Act and Offshore Energy: A View from Atlantic Canada

The Evolving Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: N.S. Court Recognizes a “Duty of Enforcement Consultation” in R. v. Martin

No Matter the Chatter, the Bid is the Bottom Line: N.S. Supreme Court Issues a Reminder in CF Construction v. Town of Westville

Defining the Boundaries: Protecting Privacy & Privilege of Digital Content @ the Canadian Border

N.S. Appeal Court puts a Lid on medical Pot: No health plan coverage & no workers compensation benefits in Canadian Elevator Industry Welfare Trust Fund v. Skinner & Skinner v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal)

Paging All International Doctors: 5 Practical Tips for Recruiting International Staff Physicians

Do Something: General Contractor Liable for Failing to Disclose the Existence of Labour & Materials Bond in Valard Construction Ltd. v. Bird Construction Co.

The Feds Finally Take the Plunge: Bill C-69 & The New Federal Offshore Renewable Energy Regime

Bill C-69 & the New Federal Impact Assessment Act: The Impact on the Role of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB)

Navigating the N.S. Marine Renewable Energy Regime: What Project Developers Need to Know

Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada: Crown Breached Fiduciary Duty to Indigenous Community – in 1858

How the Pros Get Into Canada: 5 FAQs About the NAFTA Professional Work Permit

A Lump of Coal for Christmas: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Auditor Negligent & Liable for $40 Million in Livent v. Deloitte

Denis Mahoney & Brittany Keating in the NLCA 2018 Construction Journal | Testing 1-2-3: The latest on drug & alcohol testing in safety-sensitive workplaces

Meghan Felt & David Nurse in the NLCA 2018 Construction Journal | The Atlantic Immigration Pilot: A test flight for the Newfoundland & Labrador construction industry

Balance Between Public & Operator Interests in Offshore Petroleum Resources Data is Set: Supreme Court of Canada Won’t Hear Appeal in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

Canada’s Private Corporation Tax Proposals: Year End Planning in the Face of Uncertainty

It’s Official: “Facilitation Payments” to Foreign Public Officials Violates Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA)

New Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations Effective November 1, 2017: Key Changes to the Offshore Regime

Supreme Court of Canada Tackles Freedom of Religion & the Duty to Consult in Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)

Canada Has Other Fish to Fry Between NAFTA Negotiation Rounds: CETA Provisionally Effective September 21, 2017

New N.S. Demonstration Permit for Marine Renewable Energy in the Wind (and the Waves) With Proposed Marine Renewable Energy Act Amendments

Charting a Course for Good Governance of Canada’s Emerging Ocean Economy | Offshore Aquaculture and Ocean-based Renewable Energy

CRA’s Super Priority Gains Strength: Federal Crown’s deemed trust priority for unremitted GST/HST survives bankruptcy in Canada v. Callidus Capital Corporation

Cross-Border Caution: 5 Anti-Corruption Law Compliance Program Tips

Proposed Changes to Business Income Tax Rules: A Gamechanger for Private Business Owners

Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo Services Inc. and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc.: Crown Can Rely on National Energy Board to Fulfill its Duty to Consult

The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions in Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v. York University

Making Waves: What CETA means for Atlantic Canadian Fisheries

Watching Your Claims Go Up In Smoke? Five Key Medical Cannabis Cost of Care Considerations

Canada v. Mikisew Cree First Nation: Court to Decide Whether Duty to Consult Also Applies Before Legislation is Enacted

All in the Family: The Family Shareholders’ Agreement

Northern Exposure: Anti-Corruption Law Exposes Payments to Governments Under Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (ESTMA)

Appeal Court maintains balance between public & operator interests in offshore petroleum resources data in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

Better Late than Never: N.S. Government Enacts Early Release of Holdback Regulations

Estate Planning in the Age of Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID)

Cannabis Legalization in Canada: Seeds have sprouted, but the branches are still bare

Nip it in the Bud: A 5 Step Plan for Employers to Prepare for Cannabis Legalization in Canada

Daniel Watt and Sara Mahaney in Gard Update: Legal privilege in the corporate context in Canada

Register Before You Lobby in N.B. under Lobbyists’ Registration Act