Publications

Follow These 5 Steps for Compliant Disclosure on Social Media

Published:

March 30, 2017

Author(s):

Julie Robinson, Partner at McInnes Cooper
David Wallace, Associate at McInnes Cooper
Peter L'Esperance, Articled Clerk at McInnes Cooper

Social media platforms, like Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Facebook and GooglePlus, arguably have more followers and are more closely monitored by market participants than conventional news outlets – making them an efficient and effective tool for public issuers to engage with potential customers, shareholders and other stakeholders. Recognizing this trend, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently reviewed the social media disclosure practices of issuers. On March 9, 2017, the CSA published Staff Notice 51-348 Staff’s Review of Social Media Used by Reporting Issuers summarizing its findings and expectations for reporting issuers’ use of social media while meeting their disclosure obligations.

Here are the three key areas of concern the CSA identified about public issuers’ compliance with their disclosure requirements when using social media, and five steps issuers can follow to ensure their use of social media complies with those requirements.

3 KEY AREAS OF COMPLIANCE CONCERN

The CSA reviewed the social media disclosure practices of 111 issuers. As a result, it identified three key areas of regulatory concern respecting compliance with the principles and requirements outlined in National Policy 51-201 Disclosure Standards (NP 51-201) and National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations (NI 51-102) when using this relatively new and growing disclosure venue:

Selective Disclosure. Social media postings aren’t enough for issuers to meet the securities law requirement that material information be “generally disclosed” to the public; issuers must also disclose information through conventional channels, such as press releases and SEDAR. Moreover, the Notice identifies that issuers that disclosed material forward-looking information on social media alone tended not to comply with other disclosure obligations related to forward-looking information, such as identifying the forward-looking information as such and stating the material factors or assumptions used to develop it. As a result, this forward-looking information could be misleading even to those investors who did receive it.

Unbalanced Information. NP 51-201 provides that disclosure should be factual, balanced and include both favourable and unfavourable news. The Notice identified numerous issuer social media postings that are sufficiently promotional or unbalanced to raise compliance concerns. Specifically, the Notice identified situations where issuers: provided commentary or information on social media about their financial results that did not appear to be consistent with or contained in their continuous disclosure on SEDAR, their social media disclosure was either untrue or promotional to a degree that it risked misleading investors, or they provided links via social media to untrue or unbalanced analyst reports or other articles concerning the issuer. The Notice states that where an issuer directs prospective investors to an independent analyst’s report, they should provide the names and recommendations of all independent analysts who cover the issuer in order to prevent issuers from selectively disclosing the reports of only those analysts whose views are favourable to the issuer.

Inadequate Social Media Governance Policies. The CSA observed that many issuers don’t have the policies, procedures and controls to ensure that disclosure via social media complies with regulatory standards and recommends that issuers develop and/or enhance the strength of their social media governance policies to address:

Who can post information about the issuer on social media.
What sites (including personal social media accounts as opposed to corporate social media accounts) they can use.
What type of issuer information (e.g. financial, legal, operational, marketing, etc.) they can post on social media.
What, if any, approvals are required before they can post information.
Who is responsible for monitoring the issuer’s social media accounts and third party postings about the issuer.
What other guidelines and best practices the issuer will follow.

5 STEPS TO COMPLY WITH DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS WHEN USING SOCIAL MEDIA

Here are five steps public issuers can follow to ensure their use of social media complies with the principles and requirements of NP 51-201 and NI 51-102:

Policy. Develop and enforce a social media policy addressing who can post, when they can post, on what sites they can post, the applications on which they can post and whether and what approvals they require to do so.

Training. Ensure employees responsible for an issuer’s social media content are trained on the issuer’s disclosure obligations as expressed in NI 51-102 and the principles outlined in NP 51-201.

Timing. Co-ordinate the timing and content of disclosure via conventional channels, such as SEDAR and news releases, and those via social media and ensure to make disclosure via conventional methods before, not after, social media.

Content. Ensure social media use for marketing purposes is balanced, accurate and consistent with continuous disclosure on SEDAR.
Third Party Monitoring. Establish protocols for sharing or linking to analyst reports or third party articles, including ensuring the information in the report or article is current and accurate and disclosing the identity of the author or analyst, their relationship to the issuer and the names and/or recommendations of other analysts covering the issuer.

Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Corporate Finance & Securities Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.

McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2017. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

Follow These 5 Steps for Compliant Disclosure on Social Media

Published:

Author(s):

Share

Share

Related Lawyers

Julie Robinson

David Wallace

Related Services

Related Industries

Related Publications

Limited Options: New Employee Stock Option Tax Rules Effective July 1, 2021

Professional Health Services Sector M&A Deals: 5 Legal Positioning Tips

5 Term Sheet FAQs for Startups & Growing Companies

Wastech Services Ltd. v. Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District: 3 Tips to Exercise Contractual Discretion in Good Faith

Estate Planning: Two Trust Solutions

China – Canada Connections: Estate Planning Obstacles & Opportunities

5 Key Privacy FAQs for Startups & Growing Businesses

C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger: 3 Tips to Honestly Exercise Contract Rights

Expedite Entry of Foreign “Essential” Workers to Canada: 10 Essential Tips

New Trust Reporting Requirements Effective for 2021 Tax Year

Using Social Media Influencer Marketing: 6 Legal Tips

Getting the Deal Done: 3 Key Terms to Conserve Cash in M&A Deals

What’s the Deal? Creating, Interpreting & Enforcing Electronic Contracts

3 Key Estate Planning Considerations for Business Owners

3 Key Estate Plan Benefits & Ingredients

10 Incorporation FAQs for Startups

Canadian Governance Diversity Disclosure Obligations: Get on Board

Playing it Safe: Employer Obligations To Employees Working From Home

Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller: One-Sided Standard Form Clauses May Be Unenforceable

Top 5 Legal Considerations When Launching a FINTECH Startup

Michael Melvin in The Franchise Voice | Legal Digest (Spring 2020)

Callidus Capital Corp: Policing CCAA Proceedings

Coping with COVID-19: The Impact of Public Health Measures on Parenting Orders

Coping with COVID-19: New Requirements for Employer Relief

Coping with COVID-19: 5 Steps to Compliant Socially Distant AGMs

Coping with COVID-19: 3 Legal Remedies for Contractual Liability Risks

3 Ways to Commercialize Your Intellectual Property (IP) Rights

Still an Option: Feds Delay New Tax Rules for Employee Stock Options

CSA Staff Notice 51-359: Corporate Governance Compliance by Public Cannabis Co.’s

Toward More Transparency: 3 More Key Changes to the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA)

5 Key FAQs About Canadian Cannabis Company “Key Investor” Disclosure Requirements

“Register for Individuals with Significant Control”: 5 Key Facts CBCA Corporations Need to Know to Comply

5 Basics Every Startup & Growing Business Should Know About Employment Law

S.A. v. Metro Vancouver Housing Corp.: Can you trust a Henson trust?

Cannabis Compliance: 3 Tips to Help Cannabis Industry Reporting Issuers Comply with Securities Law Disclosure Obligations

Incorporating a Business? Incorporating in N.S. Will Soon Be More Attractive

Digital Privacy Act Mandatory Data Breach Response Obligations: 5 Key Focus Areas For Your Compliance Plan

The Digital Privacy Act: 5 FAQs About the Mandatory Data Breach Response Obligations Effective November 1, 2018

10 Key Terms to Make Clear in Every Software Licensing Agreement

P.E.I. Joins (Most of) the Rest of Canada: 3 Ways the New P.E.I. Business Corporations Act Will Modernize Prince Edward Island Corporations

Defining the Boundaries: Protecting Privacy & Privilege of Digital Content @ the Canadian Border

You’ve Come a Long Way, CBCA: 3 Key Changes Modernize the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA)

Jurisdiction Over Internet Defamation: Same Law, Different Facts in Haaretz v. Goldhar

The Global Talent Stream: 5 Practical Learnings About the Latest Immigration Star

More Valuable Than Money? The 5 Most Common Equity Compensation Plans

How the Pros Get Into Canada: 5 FAQs About the NAFTA Professional Work Permit

The Legal Reality: Canadian Appeal Court decides “Virtual Presence” is enough for production order for user information against non-Canadian company in British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Brecknell

A Lump of Coal for Christmas: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Auditor Negligent & Liable for $40 Million in Livent v. Deloitte

Is cryptocurrency the right tool for your company to raise capital? 5 FAQs about Initial Coin Offerings (ICO)

Canada’s Private Corporation Tax Proposals: Year End Planning in the Face of Uncertainty

It’s Official: “Facilitation Payments” to Foreign Public Officials Violates Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA)

10 Legal Considerations When Incorporating Your Startup

2018 Planning Starts Now for TSX-Listed Issuers: TSX Updates Disclosure Requirements

Protect Your Assets: 3 Best Practices for Intellectual Property (IP) Owners

No NAFTA? No Problem – For Temporary Business Travel, That Is

Transformative Changes to Nova Scotia DB Funding Framework Possible

CRA’s Super Priority Gains Strength: Federal Crown’s deemed trust priority for unremitted GST/HST survives bankruptcy in Canada v. Callidus Capital Corporation

Cross-Border Caution: 5 Anti-Corruption Law Compliance Program Tips

Proposed Changes to Business Income Tax Rules: A Gamechanger for Private Business Owners

The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions in Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v. York University

Steering clear of personal liability for oppression: Supreme Court of Canada offers guidance to corporate leaders in Wilson v. Alharayeri

Growing Your Business: 3 Structuring Solutions

Go Global @ Home: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Global Order to Remove Internet Content in Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc.

Like it or Not: Supreme Court of Canada decides class action against Facebook can go ahead in B.C. – despite its terms of use in Douez v. Facebook, Inc.