March 14, 2024
On March 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada decided a police request for disclosure of an IP address is a “search” under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – and police require a court order to obtain it. The decision in R. v. Bykovets will likely motivate Canadian police to clamor for an alternative to production orders to facilitate access to this kind of information, as they have in the past under the name “lawful access”. In the meantime, companies are wise to require a legally enforceable production order or a Missing Persons Act order before providing Canadian law enforcement with any customer information, including IP addresses, basic subscriber information (BSI) and the like. And while the Court’s decision is about police’s ability to obtain the information and make use of it in a prosecution, there’s a good chance courts will treat it as authority for requiring service providers and intermediaries to closely scrutinize any requests to provide information to law enforcement. Here’s a look at the decision and three key privacy law take-aways.
In R. v. Bykovets, police were investigating fraudulent online purchases made from a liquor store. Police approached the store’s payment processor and asked for the IP addresses associated with the fraudulent transactions. The payments processor voluntarily handed the information over. Police then sought and obtained a production order requiring the internet service provider to provide the customer’s name and address associated with the IP addresses (a.k.a. a “Spencer Order” named for the 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision that held police require a court order to get the customer name and address associated with a particular IP address from a particular time). Police arrested and charged the customer with criminal offences. At their trial, the customer argued getting the IP addresses was a “search” under section 8 of the Charter, which protects everyone from unreasonable searches and seizures. Police could therefore only get the IP addresses with a production order or if there were “exigent circumstances”. The trial court decided the customer didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the IP addresses held by the payments processor, so police didn’t require a production order to get them. A majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal agreed, with one judge disagreeing. But a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (five of the nine judges) did not. The Court decided a request by police for an IP address is a “search” under section 8 of the Charter and police require a Criminal Code of Canada production order to get them.
Here are three key privacy law take-aways from the decision in R. v. Bykovets.
Modern Society. The decision recognizes and reflects the realities of today’s digital world. Third parties often hold a lot of information about people that they’ve “incidentally” collected because of technology. The Court expressly recognized that living in today’s digital world requires people do much online, necessitating disclosing IP address information to a range of third parties. The Court noted an IP address is the link between an Internet user and their online activity that might not directly identify an individual but can be connected to an individual or from which their behaviour can be inferred by analysis of data associated with the IP address use. The Court reasoned that for section 8 to meaningfully protect Canadians’ online privacy in today’s digital world it must protect their IP address – and leaving to private corporations the decision whether to disclose this information that “may betray our most intimate selves” to police isn’t acceptable. The Court concluded that recognizing a reasonable expectation of privacy in IP addresses ensures the “veil of privacy” Canadians expect when they access the Internet is lifted only when an independent court is satisfied that providing it to the government serves a legitimate law enforcement purpose.
Lawful Authority. It’s important to remember that police generally bear the risk whether they can obtain the information sought and subsequently use it in a prosecution. This decision didn’t focus on the payments processor and whether its disclosure to police was “lawful”. In Alberta, where this case originated, the payments processor would be subject to the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act, which permits disclosure to a Canadian law enforcement agency to assist in an investigation undertaken with either a view to a law enforcement proceeding or from which a law enforcement proceeding is likely to result. However, the federal privacy law (the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act or PIPEDA, soon to be replaced by the Consumer Privacy Protection Act or CPPA) only permits the disclosure where “required by law”. The Court’s 2014 Spencer decision found the reference to “lawful authority” in PIPEDA must be something substantially more than just a legitimate police investigation. A Criminal Code production order creates such a lawful compulsion and satisfies the “required by law” test. The Court’s conclusion indicates it remains vigilant about reasonable expectations of privacy for the purposes of section 8 of the Charter in a time of evolving technologies when information is increasingly spread to third party repositories – and that these repositories are not available to law enforcement to access without judicial authorization.
Exigent Circumstances. Even without a court order, Canadian Police can still lawfully require third parties to provide IP logs in exigent circumstances. Under PIDEDA, those holding personal information can voluntarily make such a disclosure to a person “who needs the information because of an emergency that threatens the life, health or security of an individual and, if the individual whom the information is about is alive, the organization informs that individual in writing without delay of the disclosure.” For example, an imminent risk of serious self-harm by a user would likely constitute such exigent circumstances. However, absent such exigent circumstances a court order or other legal compulsion (such as a production order or Missing Persons Act order is required to require disclosure of IP address logs.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our Privacy, Data Protection & Cyber Security Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss whether and when you should disclose information to law enforcement.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2024. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Dec 15, 2023
Over four years after it began, the federal government still hasn’t finalized its overhaul of the private sector privacy law regime that both…
Sep 25, 2023
There’s a new scam on the web: Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) scams. Most are familiar with established scams like phishing and ransomware and…
Aug 10, 2023
Canada’s first Tech Talent Strategy aims to aggressively attract tech talent to “fuel innovation and drive emerging technologies forward”.…
Jun 9, 2023
You arrive at the legendary Madison Square Garden to catch the Mariah Carey concert. It’s the big event of the trip – the reason you came to…
Apr 27, 2023
The benefits to employees, and often to employers, of remote work has made it a staple of today’s workplace. But the move to remote work…
Feb 1, 2023
On January 26, 2023, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) released a report of findings requiring companies using targeted…
Jan 26, 2023
In November 2022, the Ontario Court of Appeal definitively decided an organization whose information systems are breached by a malicious third…
Jul 20, 2022
There’s a new privacy law coming to Canada. In June, the federal government introduced a complete overhaul of the privacy law regime that both…
Jun 30, 2022
On June 16, 2022, the federal government took a second shot at a complete overhaul of the private sector privacy law regime that both protects…
May 20, 2022
On May 22, 2010 (affectionately known as “Bitcoin Pizza Day”), a Floridian bought two Papa John's pizzas with Bitcoin. The day is famous…
Jan 25, 2022
More and more people are using smart contracts: the global smart contracts market was valued at USD $145M in 2020; it’s projected to be valued…
Dec 16, 2021
We updated this publication on January 12, 2024. The name of the game is to have a plan to mitigate the risk that a data breach will happen…
Jan 26, 2021
Updated March 4, 2022. Privacy is critical to every business in every sector, including startups and growing businesses: to comply with the…
Dec 2, 2020
Using social media influencers and micro-influencers is an increasingly effective marketing strategy. Social media use is pervasive; 94% of…
Nov 19, 2020
We updated this publication on June 30, 2022. NOTE: On June 16, 2022, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-27: Digital Charter…
Nov 17, 2020
We updated this publication on July 11, 2023. Spurred by the COVID-19 Pandemic and bricks-and-mortar closures, businesses – from SMEs to…
Aug 12, 2020
This publication has been updated as of May 5, 2021. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has led many employees to continue working from home, by…
Jul 6, 2020
On June 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada released Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, a much-awaited decision regarding the enforceability of…
Jun 12, 2020
The financial technology (Fintech) industry uses technology to support and enhance financial and banking services.
Mar 28, 2019
Organizations subject to Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) – those that collect, use or…
Feb 20, 2019
On February 14, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada decided yet another criminal law decision that will likely have broader ramifications for…
Dec 19, 2018
On December 13, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that a third party can’t waive a person’s right to privacy or their rights under…
Aug 20, 2018
Every organization subject to Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) - every organization that…
Aug 3, 2018
As of November 1, 2018, organizations in Canada subject to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) will face…
Jul 18, 2018
Most businesses – from startups to SMEs to multi-nationals, and from private family-owned businesses to public corporations – will use…
Jun 13, 2018
Businesspeople (and their legal counsel) are on the road more than ever before: according to Statistics Canada, while Canada-U.S. traffic is…
Jun 11, 2018
On June 6, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada considered the test for jurisdiction over an allegedly defamatory Internet article – the…
Apr 2, 2018
Equity compensation plans are a valuable and versatile tool for many corporations, from early-stage startups to established blue-chips.…
Jan 12, 2018
Whether a provincial court will grant police a “production order” under the Criminal Code of Canada requiring a non-Canadian company to…
Nov 16, 2017
Corporations are the leading business vehicle in modern commerce. For startups, properly structuring and incorporating is critical to avoid…
Oct 31, 2017
Intellectual Property (IP) can be a valuable asset – even the most valuable asset – of a business. So it’s worth making sure the business…
Jul 18, 2017
On July 12, 2017, the Federal Court of Canada made it clear that there are but two ways to avoid a tariff set by the Copyright Board of Canada…
Jul 17, 2017
A corporation does not always sail in calm or safe waters. Cash shortages, unattainable or unmet goals, Board disagreements over the best course…
Jul 13, 2017
When growing your business, you face many decisions, including choosing the business structure that is right for you. Your legal team can be…
Jun 28, 2017
On June 28, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed a Canadian court can issue an interlocutory injunction (an order requiring an entity or…
Jun 23, 2017
On June 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that in a contest between the choice of forum clause in Facebook’s online terms of use…
Jun 7, 2017
On June 7, 2017, the federal government repealed the regulations that would have brought into effect the sections of Canada’s Anti Spam…
Apr 6, 2017
Adding a third jurisdiction to Gard Update’s comparison between privilege in the corporate context under U.S. and English law, McInnes Cooper…
Mar 30, 2017
Social media platforms, like Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Facebook and GooglePlus, arguably have more followers and are more closely…
Mar 30, 2017
There are very few examples of a Canadian court interpreting and opining on the provisions of an information technology contract. So the Ontario…
Feb 24, 2017
Updated January 29, 2024. Most organizations (72%) store the personal information of customers. employees, suppliers, vendors or partners,…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Jan 13, 2017
On January 11, 2017, Emera Inc. offered an electrifying opportunity for renewable energy developers to potentially access the New England…
Dec 15, 2016
On December 13, 2016, the Province of Nova Scotia released for comment draft regulations that will establish the Solar for Community Buildings…
Dec 7, 2016
Updated February 7, 2024. We live in a world of change. New ideas and new industries are rapidly developing and the list keeps growing: tidal…
Nov 28, 2016
On November 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided privilege wins again - twice. In two separate decisions - Lizotte v. Aviva Insurance…
Nov 22, 2016
On November 17, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada decided a mortgagee has the mortgagor’s implied consent to disclose its discharge statement…
Oct 21, 2016
All shareholders – whether in a startup, a small or large business or a family-owned business – can benefit from a shareholders’…
Oct 19, 2016
We updated this publication on January 17, 2023. For many businesses, large and small, their “Intellectual Property” (IP) is one of their…
Oct 19, 2016
Business owners wear many hats – including employer. Your employees may be your business’s greatest asset, but they could also be your…
May 10, 2016
This publication has been updated as at April 18, 2022. Access to sufficient capital is always a business issue, from the startup stage right…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Jan 27, 2016
On January 21, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dramatically expanded the scope of legal privacy protection – and the liability…
Jan 18, 2016
On January 14, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court decided that Canadians have a clear privacy interest in their records of their cellular…
Oct 19, 2015
Access to sufficient capital to fund operations, research and development, and other costs is a key challenge for start-ups and for some small…
Sep 29, 2015
The anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-spam Legislation (CASL) took effect on July 1, 2014 amidst hype, controversy and dire warnings. Were…
Jul 29, 2015
On July 27, 2015, the Federal Court of Canada decided a lawsuit by medical marijuana program participants against the Federal Government…
Jun 2, 2015
Effective April 22, 2015 the NS Government enacted the NS Missing Persons Act, lowering the threshold for police to get an order to access…
Mar 25, 2015
On March 3, 2015 Canada’s Privacy Commissioner determined that Health Canada breached privacy laws by mailing letters to over 40,000 Marihuana…
Mar 6, 2015
On March 5, 2015, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (the CRTC, the main agency charged with administering and enforcing most of CASL)…
Dec 11, 2014
On December 11, 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada continued its trend to recognize privacy rights – and develop the law to protect them –…
Dec 11, 2014
On January 15, 2015, the software provisions of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) will take effect. CASL’s anti-spam sections, touted…
Dec 1, 2014
The construction industry - project owners, contractors, subcontractors and trades - might be relaxing, ignoring the hype around Canada’s…
Oct 14, 2014
CASL’s anti-spam sections came into force on July 1, 2014. Every organization that CASL affects should now be complying with it – and their…
Aug 1, 2014
Most Canadians have heard about Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL): we’ve been bombarded with “CASL Compliant” emails asking us to…
Jun 16, 2014
On June 13, 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada decided that Canadians have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their online activities, and…
Jun 12, 2014
The countdown to CASL is almost over: there are only 13 business days until the anti-spam provisions of CASL – and most of the penalties for…
Jun 11, 2014
Note: For an update on Crowdfunding, read: New Kid on the Block – Crowdfunding Joins Traditional Equity-Based Funding Options for Start-ups…
May 8, 2014
On July 1, 2014 – less than two months from now - the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) take effect. Individuals…
Apr 15, 2014
The countdown to CASL is on: on July 1, 2014, the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (“CASL”) take effect. Individuals…
Mar 19, 2014
As organizations turn to cloud computing services, ensuring compliance with legislation and reducing privacy risks is key. In Canada, there is…
Feb 28, 2014
On July 1, 2014, the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (aka “CASL”) will take effect. CASL is: Broad. It applies…
Feb 28, 2014
On July 1, 2014, the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (aka “CASL”) take effect. CASL will apply to just about every…
Nov 8, 2013
On November 7, 2013, the SCC decided police require specific authorization in a search warrant to search the data in a computer because of the…
Nov 28, 2012
On October 19, 2012 the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decided that a teacher criminally charged with possession of child pornography and…
Oct 22, 2012
Mr. Cole was a high school teacher with an employer owned and issued laptop computer. He also used it for incidental personal purposes, which…
May 6, 2011
In March 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that an employee had a limited expectation of privacy in the contents of a work computer. The…
Apr 7, 2011
Note: Click here to read an updated version of this Legal Update in Cloud Computing: A Privacy FAQ as seen in as seen in CCCA Magazine, Spring…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.