Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

  • Our Team

    Our Team

    • Lawyers & Clerks
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Human Resources
    • Marketing & Business Development
    • Paraprofessional Services
  • Our Services

    Our Services

    • Service Areas
      • Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
      • Administrative Law
      • Agribusiness
      • Banking and Financial Services
      • Bankruptcy and Insolvency
      • Business Disputes
      • Business Immigration
      • Class Actions
      • Construction Law
      • Corporate and Business
      • Corporate Finance and Securities
      • Corporate Governance and Compliance
      • Cross-Border Law
      • Education Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Estates and Trusts
      • Foreign Direct Investment
      • Franchise Law
      • Health Law
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property
      • Labour and Employment
      • Litigation
      • Maritime Law
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Municipal Law
      • P3 and Infrastructure
      • Pensions and Benefits
      • Privacy, Data Protection and Cyber Security
      • Public Law
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation of Professions
      • SISIP LTD Allowances Class Action
      • Tax
      • Technology
      • View All
    • Industries
      • Cannabis
      • Construction & Property Development
      • Energy & Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Government & Institutions
      • Insurance
      • Manufacturing, Processing & Sales
      • Mining
      • Ocean Economy
      • Private Clients
      • Startups & High Growth Companies
      • Technology
      • View All
    • More Services
      • MC Advisory
      • MC Legal Lab
  • Our Insights
  • Our Firm

    Our Firm

    • Our Values
    • Our History
    • Our Global Reach
    • Our News
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Collective Social Responsibility
    • Environmental Stewardship
    • Pro Bono Program
  • Our Careers

    Our Careers

    • Lawyer Opportunities
    • Business Professional Opportunities
    • Paralegal & Legal Assistant Opportunities
    • Summer Student & Articling Opportunities
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Collective Social Responsibility
  • 1.866.439.6246
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Stay Updated
  • Contact Us
  • LexMundi World Ready
  • Privacy Policy
  • http://linkedin.com
  • http://facebook.com
  • http://twitter.com
  • 1.866.439.6246
Home > Our Insights > Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA) Effective February 26, 2016: 7 Key Changes Toughen Up Atlantic Offshore and North Oil & Gas Regulatory Regime
Publications

Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA) Effective February 26, 2016: 7 Key Changes Toughen Up Atlantic Offshore and North Oil & Gas Regulatory Regime

Published:

February 15, 2016

Author(s):

  • Daniel Watt, Partner at McInnes Cooper
  • Sara Mahaney, Former Lawyer at McInnes Cooper

Share

Print

On February 26, 2016, the bulk of the offshore-related amendments of the Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA, formerly known as Bill C-22) take effect. ESSA significantly changes the regulatory regime in the Atlantic offshore and North oil and gas sector – and ultimately creates a tougher liability regime for environmental damage in these areas.

The federal government introduced ESSA, then known as Bill C-22, on January 30, 2014 (to learn more about Bill C-22 as it was introduced, read McInnes Cooper’s Legal Update: Feds Propose Energy Safety & Security Act – and Toughen Up Atlantic Offshore & North Oil & Gas Regimes) and  passed it on February 26, 2015. ESSA achieves the changes to the offshore petroleum regulatory regime through amendments to the Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act (COGOA), the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act (the Accord Acts) (altogether the Acts).

Here are the seven key changes to the Atlantic offshore and North petroleum regulatory regime under ESSA that will impact companies with existing and prospective interests on February 26, 2016.

1. “Polluter Pays” principle of accountability

One of the express purposes of ESSA’s operations provisions is the promotion of “accountability in accordance with the ‘polluter pays’ principle”. This may result in a stricter application of the Acts, particularly in light of the changes to the financial requirements provisions; while the polluter pays principle was implicit in the previous legislation, courts will have to consider this express new purpose in prosecutions or civil claims for pollution.

2. Higher limits on no-fault, absolute liability for spills

The most important change for many industry participants is the increased amount and range of potential liability for environmental damages under ESSA. Many typical offshore contracts allocate liability through “knock-for-knock” provisions in which each party will bear the cost of any damage or loss it suffers, regardless of the other party’s fault; careful drafting of these clauses will become even more important under ESSA.

Higher limits on no-fault, absolute liability. Although at-fault liability for damages in the event of a spill or debris remains unlimited under ESSA, the limit for no-fault, absolute liability is significantly higher. Without proof of any fault, the liability limits applicable to any person required to obtain an authorization will increase:

  • From $30M to $1B for the NS and NL offshore areas under the Accord Acts.
  • From $40M to $1B for Arctic waters under COGOA.

The Acts will also now allow these limits to be increased by regulation, making it easier and faster to increase them further in the future.

Expanded range of liability. ESSA also expands the types of damages for which operators can be liable. Whether at-fault or no-fault, an operator is liable for:

  • All actual loss or damage as result of a spill or debris or as a result of any action or measure taken in relation to a spill or debris.
  • Costs and expenses the government or any other person incurred in taking any action or measure in relation to the spill or debris.
  • All loss of non-use value relating to a public resource affected by a spill or debris or as a result of any action or measure taken in relation to the spill or debris. The claim for loss of non-use value damages is relatively novel in the offshore context but in practice, it will likely be quite restricted: non-use value claims are actionable only by the Crown and aren’t available to private parties; the regulator isn’t required to consider the value when determining financial resources requirements (discussed below); and such claims are accorded last priority.

Vicarious Liability. Operators will also be vicariously liable for losses caused by the conduct of their contractors and subcontractors in relation to spills or debris.

3. More stringent Financial Resources & Financial Responsibility requirements

Operators will now also have to prove they have the financial wherewithal to cover the significant increase in their liability exposure for environmental damage. The new limits aren’t extraordinarily high in the global offshore context, and are unlikely to deter the major industry participants from investing in exploration and development. But they may make it more difficult for smaller industry participants to operate in the Canadian offshore – particularly in the current economic climate.

Greater financial resources. Operators must still provide proof of financial responsibility (unfettered access to funds) – but the extent of the financial resources they must prove is significantly higher. Currently, an operator must provide the applicable Board with proof of financial responsibility in an amount satisfactory to the Board; it doesn’t, however, have to prove it has the financial resources to satisfy the absolute liability limit, although in practice, the security required under the current $30M cap may do so. For activities other than drilling, development and production, the amount will still be determined by the Board; but for applicants for drilling, development and production authorizations, things will change – a lot:

  • The amount will be fixed at $100M or a greater amount that the Board determines if it considers it necessary.
  • In addition, an operator will now also have to provide proof that it has financial resources necessary to pay the greatest of the absolute liability limits in the applicable Act – which in the Atlantic offshore will be $1B.

The Boards will also have discretion to recommend that proof of financial resources be in a lesser amount than the liability cap. The proof must remain in force for the duration of the work or activity and, unless the Board decides otherwise, for one year after the Board is notified that the last well in respect of which the authorization was issued is abandoned.

Form of proof TBA. New financial requirements regulations will ultimately set out the form of proof required. These regulations are currently published in draft form in the Canada Gazette; if passed, they will require the applicant to provide a statement of net assets or of funding arrangements that demonstrates, to the Board’s satisfaction, it is able to pay the applicable amount. The statement will also have to be accompanied by one or more of the following “substantiating documents”: the most recent audited annual financial statement and, if available, a current credit rating; a promissory note; an insurance policy or a certificate of insurance; an escrow agreement; a letter of credit; a line of credit agreement with funds available; a guarantee agreement; a security bond; a pledge agreement; an indemnity bond; or suretyship agreement.

Pooled funds option. A Board may alternatively accept proof that the applicant is a participant in a pooled fund established by the oil and gas industry, maintained at a minimum of $250 million, and meeting any other requirements that may be established by regulation. The form of the pooled fund will largely be left to industry, with minimum requirements set out in the financial requirements regulations.

4. CEAA environmental assessments by Boards

The CNSOPB and the CNLOPB will be “responsible authorities” under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA), and responsibility for conducting federal environmental assessments (EAs) for offshore activities will be transferred from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency to the Boards. The federal government’s stated impetus for this change is to reduce the number of regulators necessary for project approval and to allow the regulator most closely connected with a project to conduct EAs. It’s not clear, however, that the Boards themselves wanted this increased responsibility. In particular, they have little experience with the quasi-judicial roles and public hearings that larger EAs will undoubtedly require, and neither Board is currently staffed or resourced for such tasks.

Currently, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency conducts CEAA EAs for offshore activities and the Accord Acts don’t enable the Boards to conduct public hearings, a precondition for EA responsibility under CEAA. ESSA will enable the Boards to hold public hearings, while draft regulations made under CEAA will designate the Boards as “responsible authorities.” These regulations (currently published in the Canada Gazette) will transfer responsibility for EAs to the Boards. The respective Board’s responsibility for EAs will be triggered where the physical activity (including any incidental physical activity) meets all of the following criteria:

  • It’s carried out in the offshore area.
  • It’s designated by regulations or in an order made under CEAA.
  • It’s one for which the Board is the responsible authority under CEAA.
  • It’s one in relation to which an EA wasn’t referred to a review panel under CEAA.

Skeletal process. The new EA provisions are skeletal and the Boards will have to put flesh on them, but neither has yet indicated what its EA process will look like. ESSA includes the following basic processes:

  • The CEAA process will be the “EA by a Responsible Authority”.
  • Public notice and consultation are required.
  • The Boards must issue decisions within 12 months from the date of the completed application.
  • If a Board requires an applicant to provide information or undertake a study, the time the applicant takes to comply with the requirements won’t be included in the 12-month period.
  • The Boards may institute a Participant Funding Program to facilitate public participation in the EA.
  • The Boards may recover their costs of these public hearings.

There may be some real differences between CNSPOPB and CNLOPB in light of their varied activity levels and past experience with EAs, but some consistencies can be expected. It’s not clear when the Boards will release their plans for EAs; a number of competing activities at the Boards, such as the Frontier and Offshore Regulatory Renewal Initiative (“FORRI”, a joint initiative of government and the NEB, CNLOPB and CNSOPB in which all operations-related regulations made under Part III of the Accord Acts and COGOA will be updated) and the need to create permanent occupational health and safety regulations, may be taking precedence over planning for the EA role. The Boards’ efforts and resources are probably focused on these initiatives, and offshore activities don’t compel immediate action, at least in Nova Scotia: BP’s exploratory drilling program is planned for 2017, while Shell’s Shelburne Basin project is under CEAA Agency responsibility.

Public consultation approaches. The CEAA’s “EA by a Responsible Authority” process requires public consultation but neither CEAA nor the Accord Acts post-ESSA expressly mandates public hearings; the bulk of ESSA’s provisions on hearings relate to the disclosure of confidential information. The Boards’ past experiences will likely shape how consultation takes place and when hearings occur. For example, the CNSOPB, given its experience and size, will probably be inclined to avoid an onerous NEB-type process and prefer consultation by written submissions. Funding written consultation, which the CEAA Agency currently does, could ease public calls for full oral hearings. The Boards may be able to foster this approach through the development of Participant Funding Programs, which CEAA requires and ESSA will permit the Boards to develop. However, it will be difficult to resist public calls for oral hearings once a proponent seeks authorization for major designated activities and the Boards have the power to hold oral hearings.

Broader information disclosure. ESSA gives the Boards broader authority to disclose confidential information by making significant amendments to the Accord Acts and COGOA provisions governing disclosure of information submitted to them. Currently, information submitted to the Board is “privileged” and the Boards can’t disclose it without the submitting party’s written consent (although some information, such as seismic or other geophysical data, is only privileged for a certain time period, after which the Boards may disclose it). Post-ESSA, however, the Boards will be able to disclose a broader range of information:

  • Certain information to domestic and foreign governments and agencies for the purposes of laws dealing with a petroleum-related work or activity. The receiving party must undertake to keep the information confidential and they must make disclosure in accordance with any agreed-to conditions. Disclosure to a foreign government or agency will require written approval of the federal Minister of Natural Resources or corresponding provincial minister.
  • Information relating to safety or environmental protection to the public, including information provided in relation to a licensing application or an authorization request, if the Board is satisfied the public interest in disclosure outweighs the associated risks. The Board must give the supplier of the information notice of its intention to disclose; the information supplier then has 20 days to make written submissions objecting and, if the Board still decides to disclose, 20 days to apply for judicial review of the Board’s decision.

There is some uncertainty around certain of the Acts’ disclosure provisions because of ongoing substantial litigation by a single seismic operator claiming that seismic data it submitted to the NEB and the Boards can’t be disclosed. Interestingly, the ESSA amendments don’t clarify the currently contested disclosure provisions, so the uncertainty this litigation is causing will be left to the courts to resolve.

5. Firmer footing for cost recovery powers

ESSA also puts the Boards’ ability to recover their costs from industry participants on firmer legal footing by providing a regulation-making power with respect to cost recovery. Currently, compliance with the Boards’ cost recovery guidelines is a condition of Board authorizations. Draft regulations currently published in the Canada Gazette mandate four cost recovery methods: regulatory activity plans for larger, complex projects; formula fees for smaller projects; direct billing for full regulator costs of requested procedures; and set geodata centre fees. The approach will be the same across the NEB, CNLOPB and CNSOPB, but the fee variables and coefficients will differ.

6. Stronger enforcement powers and tougher consequences

ESSA will add a deterrent component to the Acts by increasing the Boards’ enforcement powers and providing for a wider – and tougher – array of sanctions.

Stronger enforcement powers. Boards will have the power under ESSA to directly issue administrative monetary penalties (AMPs) for violations of the regulations, in addition to their current authority to require operators to take certain safety measures or action to prevent waste of petroleum resources. Administrative monetary penalties, already a familiar feature in other federal regulatory contexts, are intended to promote regulatory compliance rather than to punish – so the Boards will also be permitted to “name and shame” by publicizing the offender’s name, the nature of the violation, and the amount of the penalty imposed.

Restricted defences. The Acts will severely restrict the defences available to persons or companies cited for violations under the AMP regime by expressly removing the common law defences of due diligence and mistake of fact.

Directors’ personal liability. Corporate directors, officers and agents will also now be exposed to personal liability if they assented to, authorized or acquiesced in the violation. The maximum penalty will be $100,000 for a corporation will be $100,000 and $25,000 for individuals.

Tougher consequences. A wide range of additional sentencing options will join those currently available for regulatory offences under the Acts. Currently, regulatory offences under the Acts are punishable:

  • If convicted on summary proceeding, by a fine of up to $100,000, imprisonment for up to a year, or both.
  • If convicted on indictment, by a fine of up to $1M, imprisonment for up to five years, or both.

Post-ESSA, courts can make additional orders against offenders. Perhaps most significantly from an operator’s commercial perspective, a court can effectively bar an operator from the offshore jurisdiction by prohibiting it from applying for any further interest, license or authorization for any period of time the court sees fit. Other orders a court can make include requiring the offender to:

  • Monitor, or pay to monitor, environmental effects from the offence.
  • Make changes to its environment management system.
  • Undergo an environmental audit.
  • Pay an “amount that the court considers appropriate” into the Environmental Damages Fund or to the federal government.
  • Publish the facts underlying the offence and the punishment.
  • Post a bond or pay into court security to ensure compliance.
  • Perform community service.
  • Pay money to “environmental, health, or other groups”.
  • Pay money to an educational institution.

Courts must also consider the new enumerated “aggravating factors” when sentencing companies convicted of regulatory offences, including whether the offence caused damage or risk of damage to the environment or to “any unique, rare, particularly important or vulnerable component of the environment.”

7. Pre-authorized Use of Spill-Treating Agents

ESSA allows the Boards to “pre-authorize” an operator to use spill-treating agents when it applies for authorizations to work in the offshore. This, at the least, increases the response options available to operators in the unfortunate event of a spill. Boards must consider whether using the agent would result in “a net environmental benefit” considering the factors prescribed by regulation and any others they deem appropriate.

Operators that have obtained the Chief Conservation Officer’s approval to use a spill-treating agent will be excused from liability under certain federal statutes for harms caused by its use, so long as it used the agent in accordance with the approval and any relevant regulations; they will not, however, be excused from harm caused by either a spill itself or the interaction between the agent and the pollutant.


Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our McInnes Cooper Energy & Natural Resources Team to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.


McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice.  You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2016.  All rights reserved.  McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it.  You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Share

Print
View Related Content

Related Lawyers

  • Daniel Watt

    Daniel Watt

    Partner

Related Services

  • Environmental Law
  • Maritime Law
  • Oil and Gas

Related Industries

  • Energy & Natural Resources
  • Ocean Economy
  • Oil and Gas

Related Publications

View All Publications
  • Court Rules in Favour of Non-Indigenous Interests in Lucrative Elver Fishery

    Jun 24, 2022

    The New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench has issued a court order to stop Indigenous fishers (all apparently members of the Wolastoqey Nation)…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Aquaculture Regulatory Decisions: The Critical Role of Industry Engagement

    Jun 6, 2022

    The Federal Court’s April 22, 2022 decision in Mowi Canada West Inc. v. Canada (Fisheries, Oceans and Coast Guard) has implications for the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Appeal Court Confirms Key Role of Courts & Injunctions to Resolve Disputes

    Feb 3, 2022

    On January 26, 2022, the British Columbia Court of Appeal extended an injunction preventing protesters from interfering with a logging…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NS Environmental Goals & Climate Change Reduction Act: In Pursuit of Sustainable Prosperity

    Nov 10, 2021

    On November 5, 2021, the Province of Nova Scotia passed the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act. The Act will serve as the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NB Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reduction Regulation: 5 Key Obligations

    Oct 29, 2021

    The New Brunswick Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation, effected under the N.B. Climate Change Act, establishes specific…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Webinar | Growing Out Atlantic Canada’s Aquaculture Industry

    Oct 19, 2021

    Canada’s aquaculture industry is poised for growth but that growth is being challenged by regulatory uncertainty and a lack of confidence…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Hiring a Foreign Company to Provide Services in Canada? 3 Immigration Issues

    Jul 27, 2021

    Canadian entities regularly contract with foreign companies to provide services in Canada. To complete its obligations under the contract, the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Dutch Court Orders Corporation to Reduce Emissions in Landmark Decision

    Jun 1, 2021

    This publication has been updated as at July 22, 2021. On May 26, 2021, the Hague District Court in the Netherlands ordered Royal Dutch Shell…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The N.S. Shared Solar Energy Program: 3 Key Facts

    Apr 13, 2021

    On April 7, 2021, the Nova Scotia government introduced Bill 97, amendments to the N.S. Electricity Act aimed at growing the solar industry in…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Indigenous Right to a Moderate Livelihood: A Need for Clarity

    Jan 20, 2021

    This publication has been updated as at August 4, 2021. 2020 was a year filled with challenges, including in the relationship between…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Final Fisheries Regulation Amendments: 3 Key Issues Addressed

    Dec 22, 2020

    The long-awaited amendments to federal fisheries regulations codifying key aspects of the Department of Fisheries & Oceans (DFO) PIIFCAF…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Coping with COVID-19: The Impact on Contractual Performance in the Energy and Natural Resources Sector

    Apr 20, 2020

    As countries around the world grapple with the spread of COVID-19, global restrictions and containment measures have presented a range of…

    Read More
    Publications
  • N.S. Battens Down Marine Renewable Energy Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

    Feb 4, 2020

    Tidal developers considering responding to the FORCE Berth D procurement now have a clearer view of just what the successful proponent will get.…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Proposed Fisheries Regulation Amendments Target Fish Processors & Buyers

    Jan 15, 2020

    NOTE: In December 2020, the federal government published the long-awaited final amendments to federal fisheries regulations codifying key…

    Read More
    Publications
  • 5 Key Requirements of Canada’s Federal Environmental Emergency Regulations

    Nov 22, 2019

    The Environmental Emergency Regulations, effected under section 200(1) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) and in force since…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Atlantic Canada Seafood Processing Mergers & Acquisitions: 3 Due Diligence Tips

    Apr 29, 2019

    The growing global population is feeding global demand for seafood. Growing demand is likely to drive investment, particularly mergers and…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Dan Watt in Energy Regulation Quarterly | The Impact Assessment Act, Canadian Energy Regulator Act and Offshore Energy: A View from Atlantic Canada

    Jul 10, 2018

    If enacted, Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Evolving Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: N.S. Court Recognizes a “Duty of Enforcement Consultation” in R. v. Martin

    Jun 29, 2018

    The Crown’s duty to consult Indigenous Peoples has evolved considerably since the Supreme Court of Canada’s first detailed articulation of…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Feds Finally Take the Plunge: Bill C-69 & The New Federal Offshore Renewable Energy Regime

    Feb 20, 2018

    The Canadian federal government has finally revealed how it proposes to regulate offshore renewable energy developments in federal waters. On…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Bill C-69 & the New Federal Impact Assessment Act: The Impact on the Role of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB)

    Feb 20, 2018

    On February 8, 2018, the Canadian federal government proposed a new Impact Assessment Act in Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Navigating the N.S. Marine Renewable Energy Regime: What Project Developers Need to Know

    Feb 13, 2018

    The much-anticipated Nova Scotia marine renewable energy regime finally has the force of law.  First introduced over two years ago, the Nova…

    Read More
    Publications
  • A Whale of a Change: 5 of the Key Changes DFO Proposes to Canada’s Fisheries Act

    Feb 9, 2018

    NOTE: On June 21, 2019, Bill C-68, An Act to Amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence, took effect.  On February 6, 2018, Bill…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada: Crown Breached Fiduciary Duty to Indigenous Community – in 1858

    Feb 8, 2018

    Over the past 15 years, most of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions respecting Indigenous Peoples in Canada have revolved around the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Balance Between Public & Operator Interests in Offshore Petroleum Resources Data is Set

    Nov 30, 2017

    On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Geophysical Service Incorporated’s (GSI) application for leave to appeal the decision…

    Read More
    Publications
  • It’s Official: “Facilitation Payments” to Foreign Public Officials Violates Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA)

    Nov 17, 2017

    It’s official: as of October 31, 2017, “facilitation payments” contravene Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA).…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Newfoundland & Labrador Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations November 1, 2017: Key Changes to the Offshore Regime

    Nov 9, 2017

    On November 3, 2017, the Newfoundland and Labrador Government published new Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations replacing the Royalty Regulations,…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Supreme Court of Canada Tackles Freedom of Religion & the Duty to Consult in Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)

    Nov 7, 2017

    On November 2, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada was faced with the Ktunaxa Nation’s claim that a Ministerial decision to approve a project…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Canada Has Other Fish to Fry Between NAFTA Negotiation Rounds: CETA Provisionally Effective September 21, 2017

    Oct 11, 2017

    The fourth round of NAFTA negotiations is set to start on October 11, 2017. But in the meantime, the Canada-European Union Comprehensive…

    Read More
    Publications
  • New N.S. Demonstration Permit for Marine Renewable Energy in the Wind (and the Waves) With Proposed Marine Renewable Energy Act Amendments

    Oct 6, 2017

    On October 5, 2017, the N.S. government took another step toward creating a globally competitive marine renewable energy industry and associated…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Charting a Course for Good Governance of Canada’s Emerging Ocean Economy | Offshore Aquaculture and Ocean-based Renewable Energy

    Sep 29, 2017

    Atlantic Canada is at a turning point. The region’s history and economic development have historically been inextricably linked to the ocean.…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Cross-Border Caution: 5 Anti-Corruption Law Compliance Program Tips

    Aug 16, 2017

    In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo Services Inc. and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc.: Crown Can Rely on National Energy Board to Fulfill its Duty to Consult

    Jul 28, 2017

    All stakeholders in any major project development already know that adequate consultation before - rather than after - a project is approved is…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Making Waves: What CETA means for Atlantic Canadian Fisheries

    Jul 11, 2017

    The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) is making waves in Canada, and for good reason: it casts the net of…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Canada v. Mikisew Cree First Nation: Court to Decide Whether Duty to Consult Also Applies Before Legislation is Enacted

    May 26, 2017

    On May 19, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear the appeal of the Federal Court of Appeal’s 2016 decision in Canada v Mikisew Cree…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Northern Exposure: Anti-Corruption Law Exposes Payments to Governments Under Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (ESTMA)

    May 11, 2017

    The Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act is one of several anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws aimed at fighting corruption in the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Appeal Court maintains balance between public & operator interests in offshore petroleum resources data in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

    May 1, 2017

    NOTE: On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Geophysical Service Incorporated’s (GSI) application for leave to appeal the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Cannabis Legalization in Canada: Seeds have sprouted, but the branches are still bare

    Apr 20, 2017

    On April 13, 2017, Canada’s federal government introduced legislation that, if passed into law, will legalize recreational cannabis in Canada.…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Nip it in the Bud: A 5 Step Plan for Employers to Prepare for Cannabis Legalization in Canada

    Apr 17, 2017

    Recreational cannabis isn’t legal yet - but much of the associated stigma is already gone, usage is up and employers are feeling the workplace…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Daniel Watt and Sara Mahaney in Gard Update: Legal privilege in the corporate context in Canada

    Apr 6, 2017

    Adding a third jurisdiction to Gard Update’s comparison between privilege in the corporate context under U.S. and English law, McInnes Cooper…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Register Before You Lobby in N.B. under Lobbyists’ Registration Act

    Apr 5, 2017

    NOTE: Consultants who were already lobbying and in-house lobbyists already employed by an organization when the new Act took effect were…

    Read More
    Publications
  • McInnes Cooper in the Maritimes Energy Association’s Member News | Go Deep: How International Legal Reform Can Prevent Legal Uncertainty from Hindering Offshore Wind & Aquaculture Growth

    Apr 4, 2017

    Legal uncertainty is a barrier to investment, and thus an adversary to growth. Unfortunately, when it comes to new and innovative technologies…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Go Deep: How International Legal Reform Can Prevent Legal Uncertainty from Hindering Offshore Wind & Aquaculture Growth

    Mar 31, 2017

    Legal uncertainty is never a good thing for industry: it’s a barrier to investment, and thus an adversary to growth. Unfortunately, the law is…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Confidentiality Risks of Doing Business With the Public Sector Just Got Riskier: Completed NS Access to Information Requests Go Online

    Jan 25, 2017

    Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Atlantic Link: 5 Key Questions About the Electrifying Opportunity to Connect to a New Renewable Energy Market

    Jan 13, 2017

    On January 11, 2017, Emera Inc. offered an electrifying opportunity for renewable energy developers to potentially access the New England…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Top Three Atlantic Canada Offshore Legal Developments of 2016

    Dec 20, 2016

    As 2016 draws to a close, Oil & Gas Team @ McInnes Cooper offers its picks for the top three legal developments of 2016 that impacted the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Time to Shine: Nova Scotia to Launch Solar Energy Pilot Program in 2017

    Dec 15, 2016

    On December 13, 2016, the Province of Nova Scotia released for comment draft regulations that will establish the Solar for Community Buildings…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Keeping It Flowing: 10 Steps to Anticipate Citizens’ Challenges to New Developments

    Dec 7, 2016

    Recently, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court denied a motion for a temporary stay of proceedings to prevent the deployment of certain tidal devices…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Public & operator interests in offshore petroleum resources data: Where will the balance be struck? in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

    Nov 9, 2016

    The balance between the public’s interest in accessing offshore petroleum resources data and operators’ commercial interests is at the heart…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Supreme Court of Canada Decides Indian Bands Assessing Leased Reserve Lands for Property Tax Purposes Can’t Have it Both Ways in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review)

    Sep 12, 2016

    On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…

    Read More
    Publications
  • DFO Decides “Last In, First Out” Policy (LIFO) is Out

    Jul 7, 2016

    On July 6, 2016, the Federal Department of Fisheries and Ocean’s (DFO) accepted the Ministerial Advisory Panel (MAP) recommendation in the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Weigh Now or Weight Later: New Cargo Container Verified Gross Mass (VGM) Rules Effective July 1, 2016

    Jun 20, 2016

    As of July 1, 2016, packed cargo containers to which the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), Chapter VI, Regulation…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Parameters of Municipal Power: Supreme Court of Canada Decides Municipality Can’t Block Radiocommunication Tower Construction in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City)

    Jun 17, 2016

    On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s “notice of reserve”, a mechanism to prevent construction, on land…

    Read More
    Publications
  • FAQs About AMPs (Administrative Monetary Penalties) in the Canadian Offshore

    Jun 10, 2016

    Administrative monetary penalties, or “AMPs”, are a new phenomenon in the Canadian offshore. AMPs were introduced to the Newfoundland &…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Assertion of Aboriginal Right Does Not Automatically Confer Eligibility to Appeal a Regulatory Approval in O’Chiese First Nation v. Alberta Energy Regulator

    Jun 6, 2016

    On June 2, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied an Alberta First Nation’s request to appeal the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of its bid…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The East Coast Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples

    Jun 6, 2016

    Each Provincial government is under the legal duty to consult; the manner in which each carries out its legal duty to consult differs depending…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Legal Defence of Due Diligence: Top 5 FAQs

    May 2, 2016

    “Due diligence” is a legal defence to many charges under occupational health and safety (OHS) laws. Here are five of the most…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The New Nova Scotia Mineral Resources Act: The Good, The Risky & The Neutral

    Apr 21, 2016

    On April 15, 2016, Bill No. 149, The Mineral Resources Act (2016) (2016 Act), passed its second reading in the NS House of Assembly. Although…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Supreme Court of Canada Decides Federal Government Has Legislative Authority Over Métis & Non-Status Indians

    Apr 19, 2016

    On April 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that Métis and “non-status Indians” are “Indians” under section 91(24) of the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Doing Business With the Public Sector: Key Confidentiality Risks & 3 Risk Management Strategies

    Mar 24, 2016

    When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Construction Project Manager Sentenced to 3½ Years for Workplace Accident in R. v. Vadim Kazenelson (aka “Metron”)

    Mar 9, 2016

    In what appears to be the first case of the conviction of a front line supervisor under section 217.1 of the Criminal Code and sentencing to a…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NB Kicks-off First Request for Expressions of Interest from Aboriginal Businesses Under New Electricity from Renewable Resources Regulation

    Feb 1, 2016

    On January 29, 2016, the New Brunswick Power Corporation (NB Power) kicked-off compliance with its obligations under the new Electricity from…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Best Practices

    Dec 21, 2015

    A practical and current guide created to help you navigate the increasingly important issues surrounding offshore decommissioning and…

    Read More
    Publications
  • University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy Research Paper – Canada, The Law of the Sea Treaty and International Payments: Where Will the Money Come From?

    Sep 8, 2015

    The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea requires parties, of which Canada is one, to make payments in respect of oil production on…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Changing Face of Aboriginal Law: 1 Short Year, 2 Big Court Decisions, 3 Key Implications for the Energy & Natural Resources Sector

    Jul 17, 2015

    On the heels of National Aboriginal Day, we pause to take a look back at two significant Aboriginal law cases decided in the last year, how…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Unproven Aboriginal Rights Enough For Lawsuit Against Private Industry in Saik’uz First Nation and Stellat’en First Nation v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.

    Jul 10, 2015

    On April 15, 2015, British Columbia’s Court of Appeal confirmed that First Nations can make certain legal claims grounded in Aboriginal rights…

    Read More
    Publications
  • 3 Reasons for Directors, Officers and Supervisors To Take Occupational Health and Safety Personally

    Jun 25, 2015

    Most people know that a company itself has OHS obligations, and that it risks corporate liability if it violates those obligations. However, not…

    Read More
    Publications
  • 5 “Legal” Reasons Why Natural Resource Companies Should Care About Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

    Dec 10, 2014

    “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR) as a concept has been floating around in business-speak for years – but stakeholders in the mining…

    Read More
    Publications
  • SCC Sets Test for – and Defines Rights of – Aboriginal Title in Canada in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. B.C.

    Jun 26, 2014

    On June 26, 2014, in a groundbreaking decision on Aboriginal title, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) significantly elaborated on the legal test…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NS Workers’ Compensation Board Issues New Policy for Psychological Injury Claims

    Apr 7, 2014

    On March 31, 2014 the NS Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) issued a new policy applicable to its adjudication of psychological injury claims…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Legal Update: The Duty to Consult – Important Lessons from Canada’s Mining Sector

    Mar 15, 2013

    Recent developments in Ontario and Yukon are an important reminder of the practical implications of the Crown’s legal Duty to Consult with…

    Read More
    Publications

Stay Updated

Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.

Connect With Us:
  • Follow us on Twitter @mcinnescooper
  • Like us on Facebook @mcinnescooperlaw
  • Join us on LinkedIn @mcinnes-cooper
  • 1.866.439.6246
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright © 2022 — McInnes Cooper
Lex Mundi Logo MC Advisory Logo