Publications

Supreme Court of Canada Says the Charter Protects the Right to Strike in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan

Published:

February 2, 2015

Author(s):

Kiersten Amos, Former Lawyer at McInnes Cooper

On January 30, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada decided that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom’s protection for freedom of association also protects the right to strike – and struck down a Saskatchewan law banning “essential services” public employees from striking because it violates this Charter right.

This is the third in a trilogy of SCC decisions in the last two weeks that explains and expands on the Charter’s protection of the right to freedom of association in the labour context. The decisions will impact whether and how the federal and provincial governments enact laws limiting the rights of public sector employees including “essential services employees”, though they have limited practical impact on private sector employers.

In May 2008 two new Saskatchewan laws took effect:

The Public Service Essential Services Act limiting the ability of public sector employees designated as “essential services” employees to strike for the purpose of the collective bargaining process; and
The Trade Union Amendment Act, 2008 changing the union certification process to increase the necessary written support level, reduce the time for written support from employees, and changing employer – employee communications.

The Saskatchewan Federation of Labour and other unions said the freedom of association protected by the Charter includes the right to strike, and both laws violate this right. They urged the SCC to declare the laws invalid.

The majority of the SCC judges agreed that the Charter right to freedom of association protects the right to strike and the Public Service Essential Services Act violated this right and is invalid:

Charter Protection of Right to Strike. The SCC reiterated that the Charter right to freedom of association protects a “meaningful process of collective bargaining”: a process the SCC defined in its January 2015 decision in Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 1 as one that gives employees both enough choice and enough independence to determine and meaningfully pursue their collective interests. The right to strike is an essential part of a meaningful collective bargaining process in Canada’s labour relations system, not just a by-product of it. This protected right to strike applies to all public sector employees – including essential services employees.

Substantial interference. The Public Service Essential Services Act gave public employers unilateral authority to decide the categories of workers prohibited from striking on the basis they provide “essential services”. Also, it didn’t provide an alternative means for employees to resolve impasses during collective bargaining. This combination substantially interfered with the employees’ freedom of association. The law went too far beyond what was reasonably needed to make sure essential services are still delivered during a strike, and the SCC declared it invalid as a result. However, the Trade Union Act, 2008 didn’t substantially interfere with these rights, and the SCC declared it valid.

Impact on Private Sector Employers. The practical impact on private sector employers is limited. The Charter only applies to government actions, like making laws, so would only apply if a government (like the provincial government) enacted or changed a labour relations law in a way that violated the right to freedom of association (including the right to strike) of private sector employees. In that case, the union’s recourse would be against the government, by challenging the validity of the law, and not against the private employer.

Read the SCC”s decision in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan, 2015 SCC 4 here.

Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our McInnes Cooper Labour & Employment Team to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.

McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2015. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

Supreme Court of Canada Says the Charter Protects the Right to Strike in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan

Published:

Author(s):

Share

Share

Related Lawyers

Kiersten Amos

Related Services

Related Industries

Related Publications

5 Key COVID-19 Labour & Employment Litigation Learnings

3 Legal Tools to Help Foster a Diverse & Inclusive Workplace

Federal OHS Violence & Harassment Prevention: 10 Key Changes January 1, 2021

10 COVID-19 Workplace Vaccination Policy Tips

Tax Implications of Working from Home During COVID-19: 10 Employer FAQs

Atlantic Canada Minimum Wage Increases Effective April 1, 2021

10 Employer FAQs About Employee COVID-19 Testing & Vaccination

Contracting Chaos: 5 Key 2020 Employment Contract Lessons

Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc.: Cause for Termination Clause Concern

P.E.I. Workplace Harassment Prevention Obligations: 5 Key Regulatory Changes July 1, 2020

Matthews v. Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd.: Employee Bonus Entitlement Lives On

Playing it Safe: Employer Obligations To Employees Working From Home

Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller: One-Sided Standard Form Clauses May Be Unenforceable

Temporary Immigration Measures Make Hiring Temporary Foreign Workers Easier

Coping with COVID-19: Planning for Business Reopening

Coping with COVID-19: Employers’ Top 10 Immigration Law FAQs

Coping with COVID-19: New Requirements for Employer Relief

Atlantic Canada Minimum Wage Changes Effective April 1, 2020: More Than Wage Rates

Coping with COVID-19: (More) Employer FAQs

Coping with COVID-19: Employer FAQs

Amanda Nash in The Advisor by NLOWE | The Top 10 Employment Contract Terms

Atlantic Canadian Employees’ Rights & Employers’ Obligations at Election Time

5 Key Changes to N.L. OHS Workplace Violence & Harassment Prevention Obligations January 1, 2020

5 Reasons to Transition Immigrant Physicians to Canadian Permanent Residence Status & 3 Key Paths to Get There

Managing Social Media @ Work: 3 Steps to an Effective Workplace Social Media Policy

5 Basics Every Startup & Growing Business Should Know About Employment Law

Atlantic Canada Minimum Wage Changes Effective April 1, 2019: In Like a Lamb

New N.B. Workplace Anti-Violence & Harassment Obligations April 1, 2019

Webinar | No Joking Matter: Complying with N.B. Workplace Anti-Violence & Harassment Requirements

Immigration Law Compliance: 5 Key Best Practices for Human Resources Professionals

Privacy Interest in Personal Computer Contents: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Ownership Isn’t 9/10 of the Law in R. v. Reeves

Collateral Damage: How Canada’s New Impaired Driving Penalties Will Impact Canadian Immigrants & Employers

10 Burning Employer FAQs About Cannabis @ Work

Webinar | 5 Key Immigration Law Compliance Best Practices for Human Resource Professionals

Sarah McInnes in workplace.ca | The Top 5 Immigration Law Facts Every HR Professional Should Know

No Minimal Impact: Atlantic Canada’s 2018 Minimum Wage Increases

Extended Parental Leave in Atlantic Canada: What to Expect When Your Employee is Expecting

The Evolving Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: N.S. Court Recognizes a “Duty of Enforcement Consultation” in R. v. Martin

Webinar | 5 Workplace Policy Areas to Manage Marijuana Risks

Defining the Boundaries: Protecting Privacy & Privilege of Digital Content @ the Canadian Border

Medical Marijuana, Residual Impairment & The Duty to Accommodate in Re Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers’ Assn. Inc. and IBEW, Local 1620 (Tizzard)

The Global Talent Stream: 5 Practical Learnings About the Latest Immigration Star

Accommodating Mental Disability: 5 Practical Tips

N.S. Appeal Court puts a Lid on medical Pot: No health plan coverage & no workers compensation benefits in Canadian Elevator Industry Welfare Trust Fund v. Skinner & Skinner v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal)

Paging All International Doctors: 5 Practical Tips for Recruiting International Staff Physicians

Webinar | #It’s Time: A 5-Step Sexual Harassment Risk Mitigation Strategy for Employers

More Valuable Than Money? The 5 Most Common Equity Compensation Plans

#It’s Time: A 5-Step Sexual Harassment Risk Mitigation Strategy for Employers

Be Diligent: 5 Practical Steps to Enforceable Workplace Policies

The Dope on Medical Cannabis Health Benefits: Key Considerations for a Coverage Strategy

How the Pros Get Into Canada: 5 FAQs About the NAFTA Professional Work Permit

Denis Mahoney & Brittany Keating in the NLCA 2018 Construction Journal | Testing 1-2-3: The latest on drug & alcohol testing in safety-sensitive workplaces

Meghan Felt & David Nurse in the NLCA 2018 Construction Journal | The Atlantic Immigration Pilot: A test flight for the Newfoundland & Labrador construction industry

5 Helpful Holiday Hints for Human Resources

Protect Your Assets: 3 Best Practices for Intellectual Property (IP) Owners

No NAFTA? No Problem – For Temporary Business Travel, That Is

5 Employer “Family Status” Discrimination & Accommodation FAQs

Transformative Changes to Nova Scotia DB Funding Framework Possible

Relief is Here: N.S. Registered Defined Benefit Plans Get Temporary Solvency Funding Relief

Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo Services Inc. and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc.: Crown Can Rely on National Energy Board to Fulfill its Duty to Consult

Federal Human Rights Law: No Gender Identity or Expression Discrimination

Take Pride @ Work: 5 Ways Employers Can Support Gender Diversity

The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions in Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v. York University

Jack Graham in Canadian Lawyer InHouse: Deconstructing the Workplace

Watching Your Claims Go Up In Smoke? Five Key Medical Cannabis Cost of Care Considerations