May 10, 2016
On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada generally affirmed the common law rule that positive covenants do not run with the land. More specifically, the Court decided that in Alberta, legislative provisions respecting payments in exchange for restrictive covenants under the terms of a development agreement between a property owners and the municipality don’t, and the subsequent owner didn’t, gain the right to the remaining payments under that agreement. While this decision specifically applies to Alberta historical protection legislation (the Historical Resources Act), it’s relevant to other Canadian provinces since most allow municipalities or similar bodies to enter into development or other agreements to incentivize or restrict development – and it raises a red flag where developers and municipalities have entered, or are considering entering, development or other agreements that include compensation from the municipality back to the developer or property owner.
In Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., the municipality and a property developer entered into an agreement pursuant to the Alberta Historical Resources Act to place restrictive covenants against the property respecting its development in exchange for a series of payments from the municipality to the property owner. Ownership of the property subsequently changed hands through a judicial sale. Section 29(3) of the Historical Resources Act specifically provides that, “[a] condition or covenant registered under subsection (2) runs with the land and the person or organization under subsection (1) that entered into the condition or covenant with the owner may enforce it whether it is positive or negative in nature and notwithstanding that the person or organization does not have an interest in any land that would be accommodated or benefited by the condition or covenant.” The question was whether the purchaser was entitled to the remaining payments from the municipality under the agreement.
The Supreme Court of Canada decided that in this case, it’s not: the common law (that is, judge-made law as opposed to legislation) rule is that positive covenants don’t run with the land – and the Historical Resources Act provisions respecting the payments doesn’t override this rule with respect to the compensation payable, and the subsequent owner didn’t gain the right to the payments.
In its broadest sense, this decision affirms the common law rule that positive covenants do not run with the land. But more narrowly, this decision raises a red flag for developers and municipalities that have or are considering entering into development agreements (and subsequent purchasers, particularly those that purchase from a property developer or through a judicial or bankruptcy sale) that include compensation from the municipality back to the developer or property owner:
Read the law. Whether a subsequent owner would automatically, on taking ownership, be entitled to previously agreed compensation from a municipality (or similar body) depends upon any legislation allowing the municipality (or similar body) to enter into such agreement. Most municipalities (or similar bodies) have the ability to enter into development or other agreements to incentivize or restrict development, though the sources of the ability varies; it could be found in, for example, under legislation governing the authority of municipalities, community planning or historical protection. Municipalities and developers or property owners must carefully review the relevant legislation to determine what in fact runs with the land – and what does not. This case illustrates that not all provisions of such an incentive agreement are equal in that respect. This decision resolves the specific question in the context of the specific legislation (the Alberta Historical Resources Act). That Act is clear that positive covenants in the municipality’s favour will run with the land, but it’s silent respecting any payments the municipality agrees to make to the landowner.
The form of the compensation. This could also affect property developers and subsequent owners where the compensation for restrictive covenants is by way of some form of reduced tax rate on the land. In this case, the agreement between the owner and the municipality provided for payments to the then land owner. But under section 28(4) of the Alberta Act (and in other provinces, under the applicable by-law or legislation), the compensation to the owner could have been by way of tax relief. The form of compensation shouldn’t change the outcome – but tax relief would be a bit more complicated to deal with than monetary payment(s) because a subsequent owner wouldn’t be entitled to the tax relief while the previous owner, that no longer pays the taxes, would.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our McInnes Cooper Real Estate Team to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2016. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Apr 12, 2023
The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has made it clear that, while the burden is high, pre-emptively vacating or discharging a builders’ lien is a…
Mar 16, 2023
We updated this publication on March 30, 2023. On January 1, 2023, the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians…
Jan 19, 2023
We updated this publication on March 29, 2023. Beginning April 30, 2023, both Canadian and non-Canadian trustees, partners of a partnership,…
May 2, 2022
On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…
Mar 4, 2022
On December 17, 2021, New Brunswick’s Local Governance Reform Act (Bill 82) amending the N.B. Local Governance Act (and other related acts and…
Nov 19, 2021
To help realtors better prepare their clients to ensure smooth real estate transactions with timely closings, here are the answers to the 10…
Nov 5, 2021
Purchasing commercial real estate as an investment, as a component of a business startup or as one asset in the share purchase of an existing…
Oct 29, 2021
On October 21, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the law concerning the circumstances in which government organizations - including…
Sep 9, 2021
We udpated this publication on March 7, 2022. The New Brunswick Construction Remedies Act, substantially came into effect on November 1,…
Jan 20, 2021
In the first update to the CCDC 2 since 2008, in December 2020 the Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) published the CCDC 2 (2020).…
Feb 4, 2020
Canada’s construction industry is abuzz with the latest innovation in lien legislation. Prompt payment requirements are being added to…
Aug 8, 2019
This publication has been updated as at January 12, 2022. Canadian provinces are looking to immigration as a solution to labour market…
Jun 29, 2018
The Crown’s duty to consult Indigenous Peoples has evolved considerably since the Supreme Court of Canada’s first detailed articulation of…
Jun 21, 2018
Lawyers regularly encourage clients to be proactive and discuss potential issues with third parties before they become real problems. But in the…
Jun 13, 2018
Businesspeople (and their legal counsel) are on the road more than ever before: according to Statistics Canada, while Canada-U.S. traffic is…
Apr 26, 2018
The N.S. Court of Appeal has reached two decisions ending one employee’s quest for coverage of the costs of his medical marijuana – at least…
Apr 17, 2018
This publication has been updated as at January 12, 2023. There’s no shortage of media coverage about a doctor shortage in Canada and the…
Feb 21, 2018
On February 15, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada decided a trustee’s fiduciary duty includes an obligation to inform beneficiaries of the…
Dec 18, 2017
The answer to the question, “What’s employers’ rationale for implementing workplace drug and alcohol testing?” is pretty…
Nov 17, 2017
It’s official: as of October 31, 2017, “facilitation payments” contravene Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA).…
Aug 16, 2017
In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…
Jul 28, 2017
All stakeholders in any major project development already know that adequate consultation before - rather than after - a project is approved is…
Jul 18, 2017
On July 12, 2017, the Federal Court of Canada made it clear that there are but two ways to avoid a tariff set by the Copyright Board of Canada…
Jul 10, 2017
The legal landscape of cannabis (a.k.a. marihuana, weed, pot …) is changing, both reflecting - and contributing to - more relaxed attitudes…
May 26, 2017
On May 19, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear the appeal of the Federal Court of Appeal’s 2016 decision in Canada v Mikisew Cree…
Apr 28, 2017
On April 24, 2017, the N.S. Government issued regulations that will finally allow the Builders’ Lien Act amendments permitting early release…
Apr 21, 2017
In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…
Apr 20, 2017
On April 13, 2017, Canada’s federal government introduced legislation that, if passed into law, will legalize recreational cannabis in Canada.…
Apr 17, 2017
Recreational cannabis isn’t legal yet - but much of the associated stigma is already gone, usage is up and employers are feeling the workplace…
Apr 5, 2017
NOTE: Consultants who were already lobbying and in-house lobbyists already employed by an organization when the new Act took effect were…
Mar 15, 2017
On March 9, 2017, the N.S. Court of Appeal stopped building inspection claims in their tracks when it decided that a defence based section…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Dec 22, 2016
Effective January 1, 2017, the kinds of trusts that can claim the Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) will be limited. Now, the PRE allows…
Dec 19, 2016
On December 14, 2016, Bill 46 and the Newfoundland and Labrador Public Procurement Act became law. The new Act isn’t yet in effect, however,…
Dec 5, 2016
It’s been a long time coming, but Newfoundland and Labrador is finally getting new public procurement legislation. On November 29, 2016, Bill…
Nov 28, 2016
On November 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided privilege wins again - twice. In two separate decisions - Lizotte v. Aviva Insurance…
Nov 22, 2016
There is an old expression about “selling the Brooklyn Bridge”. Recently, a bankrupt subcontractor attempted to register a lien against the…
Sep 23, 2016
On September 15, 2016, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal clarified the province’s statutory regime governing both the exercise of a lender’s…
Sep 19, 2016
On September 15, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided certain damage to a building under construction was covered under the relevant…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jul 5, 2016
The Ontario Court of Appeal has re-ignited the discussion about when a municipality will be held liable for its shoddy bylaw enforcement…
Jun 30, 2016
The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…
Jun 20, 2016
Real estate vendors and purchasers have high expectations of their realtors – and they don’t often hesitate to pursue legal action against…
Jun 17, 2016
In its June 16, 2016 decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City), the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s…
May 24, 2016
It’s now certain: in Newfoundland & Labrador, liens can’t be placed on Crown land or holdbacks with the possible exemption allowing for…
May 2, 2016
We updated this publication on May 8, 2023. “Due diligence” is a legal defence to many charges under occupational health and safety (OHS)…
Apr 15, 2016
On April 14, 2016, Canada’s federal Justice Minister proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Mar 9, 2016
On January 11, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sentenced a front-line supervisor to imprisonment for 3½ years for four counts of…
Jun 25, 2015
We updated this publication on May 9, 2023. Most people know a company itself has occupational health and safety (OHS) obligations and risks…
May 25, 2015
We updated this publication on July 21, 2022. Every party to a Right of Way has some idea of what that Right of Way is – but many times,…
Apr 15, 2015
On April 15, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada decided the City of Saguenay’s recitation of a religious - though non-denominational – prayer…
Mar 3, 2015
Snow can be a big nuisance at this time of year, but snow load - the weight of the snow, usually measured in pounds per square foot - can be…
Feb 9, 2015
NOTE: On April 14, 2016, the federal government proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Feb 2, 2015
On January 30, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada decided that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom’s protection for freedom of…
Dec 1, 2014
The construction industry - project owners, contractors, subcontractors and trades - might be relaxing, ignoring the hype around Canada’s…
Nov 27, 2014
Recently, the NS Court of Appeal confirmed that a union can be certified as the bargaining agent of employees based merely on their dependence…
May 28, 2014
In the slow recovery from the devastating world-wide recession of 2008-9, Canada continues to face a large “infrastructure deficit.”…
May 2, 2014
April showers bring … flood and sewage back-up claims. Flooding and sewage back-up can result in significant damage for municipal ratepayers,…
Feb 8, 2013
While much of the developed world struggles with debt and chronically low growth, Canada, one of the best-performing members of the G-7,…
Jan 8, 2013
On November 19, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) unanimously ruled a B.C. public school system’s failure to provide adequate and…
Jul 10, 2012
On March 16, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed the decision of the N.S. Court of Appeal, reinstating the N.S. Human Rights…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.