July 12, 2022
Lawyers and accountants advise clients on options for organizing their personal and business affairs in a tax-efficient way. Clients enter into arrangements and transactions, making choices based on their understanding of what the outcome will be. Typically, it’s as was expected – but sometimes, it’s not. When that happens, can clients revisit their choices? In its June 17, 2022, decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Collins Family Trust, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that Canadian superior courts will not grant an equitable remedy, either rectification or rescission, to undo or alter a concluded transaction or its documentation absent any implementation error, and if solely intended to avoid a tax liability arising from the ordinary operation of a tax statute – even if the tax rules change after the transaction was implemented. So while tax planning continues to have value, there’s always a risk: a tax strategy that’s good today, might not be good tomorrow.
“Equitable” Remedies
It’s well established that Canadian courts can grant orders to protect against unfair outcomes, such as those resulting from fraud, unconscionable transactions, and undue influence. Each Canadian superior court is both a court of law and a “court of equity”. Thus, although a contract (and contract law) might dictate a certain outcome, a court can alter that outcome if it appears to be unconscionable or unfair. But while the outcomes dictated by taxation laws might be seen to be unfair, courts have held that the ordinary operation of a tax laws isn’t a basis for equitable relief.
Rectification. Until December 2016, the courts of most Canadian provinces were quite permissive in terms of allowing individuals to re-engineer their affairs if an unexpected negative outcome was encountered, acting further to the court’s equitable jurisdiction to rectify documents and transactions. However, in its December 2016 decisions in Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) and Canada (Attorney General) v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., the Supreme Court of Canada tightened the situations in which courts can grant “rectification” orders: a judge can correct errors that occurred in the implementation of a pre-existing plan; a judge can’t engage in “retroactive planning” by rectifying documents and transactions, creating and effecting a new plan.
Rescission. Rescission, like rectification, is a means by which a superior court can ensure the application of the law doesn’t effect an inequitable outcome by unwinding or voiding a contract completely. The Fairmont Hotels decision left an important question unanswered: If a transaction couldn’t be rectified, could it nevertheless be rescinded?
Collins Family Trust
In Collins Family Trust, an accountant proposed a plan that would provide a number of benefits, including tax efficiency. The plan included the incorporation of a holding company and, the creation of a family trust. The holding company was to be the beneficiary of the family trust. The family trust borrowed funds from the holding company to purchase shares of the operating company. The family trust then earned dividends on its operating company shares. The family trust intended to pass its income to the holding company, and to do so without paying income tax, by operation of subsections 75(2) and 112(1) of the Income Tax Act. The holding company could then manage its affairs in a flexible and tax-efficient manner. Unfortunately, after this structure was set up, the Tax Court of Canada decided subsection 75(2) wasn’t available for such a structure. This decision caused the Collins family structure to fail to achieve its intended outcome: the family trust became liable to pay income tax immediately – and at the highest marginal rate.
Trial & Appeal. The Collins Family Trust applied to the B.C. Supreme Court for orders to rescind the agreements that created the structure on the basis it was inequitable not to rescind the transactions in view of the change in the tax consequences. Following the 2015 B.C. Court of Appeal decision in in Pallen Trust that a taxpayer’s mistake regarding the interpretation of a particular subsection of the Income Tax Act was a sufficient basis for the Court to grant rescission, the B.C. Supreme Court granted the rescission order. The Attorney General of Canada appealed to the B.C. Court of Appeal, but was unsuccessful.
Supreme Court of Canada. The Attorney General obtained leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada – and succeeded. The Supreme Court of Canada framed the issue as whether a taxpayer can obtain the equitable remedy of rescission to reverse a series of transactions to avoid unanticipated adverse tax consequences. The Court recognized that, in deciding the case, it must decide whether Pallen Trust (and other earlier decisions, such as the 2013 U.K. case of Pitt v. Holt) remained correct in the face of Fairmont Hotels. The Court held the limits on the rectification remedy it confirmed in Fairmont Hotels apply to all forms of equitable relief: equity is available to correct negative outcomes due to errors made in the implementation of a plan, but there is a general prohibition on retroactive tax planning by way of equitable remedies. And the simple operation of a tax statute, absent any implementation error, is not a matter calling for an equitable remedy:
Tax consequences do not flow from parties’ motivations or objectives. Rather, they flow from their freely chosen legal relationships, as established by their transactions. A taxpayer should neither be denied nor judicially accorded a benefit based solely on what they would have done had they known better.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our Tax Solutions Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss how we can help you mitigate the risks to your tax planning structures.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2022. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Sep 29, 2023
On September 21, 2023, Bill C-56, the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act, passed first reading. If passed, the Act will give developers of…
Sep 20, 2023
Can a business providing both exempt supplies and taxable supplies of goods and services claim Input Tax Credits (ITCs) under the Excise Tax Act…
Apr 25, 2023
Most initially believed the Underused Housing Tax Act would impose reporting and tax obligations only on non-Canadian and non-permanent…
Apr 13, 2023
A Will is a key ingredient of any estate plan - and one of the most important documents a person ever signs. It allows a person to control how…
Jan 19, 2023
We updated this publication on March 29, 2023. Beginning April 30, 2023, both Canadian and non-Canadian trustees, partners of a partnership,…
Jun 24, 2021
Many employers use equity compensation plans like employee stock option plans to attract, motivate, and retain talent. One reason stock options…
Mar 31, 2021
Close to five million Canadians who didn’t usually work from home, did so in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Even as public health…
Feb 12, 2021
Estate planning is a customized process; the goal is to create a plan that’s best for a person’s unique situation. And while all estate…
Feb 12, 2021
An ever increasing number of people originally from China now reside in Canada. It is more important than ever to recognize and understand the…
Dec 7, 2020
All trusts that continue to be in effect past December 31, 2020, will be subject to new reporting requirements and harsh non-compliance…
Oct 21, 2020
For business owners, estate planning is directed at protecting the business’s legacy as well as the financial security of both family members…
Oct 20, 2020
Estate planning is directed at protecting your assets and your loved ones from creditors and unnecessary income tax or probate fees, and your…
Jan 30, 2020
NOTE: The new tax rules for employee stock option plans take effect on July 1, 2021. Learn more at Limited Options: New Employee Stock Option…
Jan 31, 2019
On January 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada considered, for the first time, “Henson trusts” and the nature of a disabled…
Dec 23, 2017
Parents often threaten their children that if their behaviour did not improve they will get a lump of coal in their Christmas stockings. On…
Nov 20, 2017
October 2, 2017 marked the end of the consultation period relating to the taxation of private corporation proposals the Department of Finance…
Aug 28, 2017
Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor’s bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown’s priority to proceeds…
Aug 4, 2017
On July 18, 2017, Canada’s Minister of Finance released proposed changes to the Income Tax Act (Canada) that, if implemented, will mark one of…
Apr 21, 2017
In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…
Jan 20, 2017
Connections between Canadians and the U.S. have never been as numerous or transparent as they are now: many Canadians own U.S. property, have…
Dec 22, 2016
Effective January 1, 2017, the kinds of trusts that can claim the Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) will be limited. Now, the PRE allows…
Dec 14, 2016
On December 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified when a court can rectify a transaction that has had unintended tax consequences for…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jun 6, 2016
On June 3, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada, in two related decisions, strengthened the legal protection of solicitor-client privilege in…
Apr 15, 2016
On April 14, 2016, Canada’s federal Justice Minister proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Apr 12, 2016
Federal Budget 2016 proposed to significantly reduce the benefit of and access to the Small Business Deduction. The Small Business Deduction…
Oct 23, 2015
Subsection 55(2) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) is an anti-avoidance provision intended to prevent capital gains stripping by deeming an…
Oct 23, 2015
Incorporation offers legal advantages to sole proprietors of small businesses, including certain tax advantages. However, when a corporation…
Jul 30, 2015
Note: On June 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the National Alliance’s application for leave to appeal the New Brunswick Court…
Feb 9, 2015
NOTE: On April 14, 2016, the federal government proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Sep 11, 2014
The Canadian federal government has been concerned for some time about “treaty shopping” by non-residents – the practice of non-residents…
May 22, 2014
This publication has been updated as at February 17, 2021. Trusts offer a very useful estate planning solution for a wide variety of special…
Dec 16, 2011
In a unanimous decision rendered by Justice Rothstein, the Supreme Court of Canada today dismissed the appeal of Copthorne Holdings Limited,…
Mar 7, 2011
Effective April 1, 2011, the fishing licensing policy for the Atlantic Canada and Quebec inshore fishery will change to allow inshore fishing…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.