December 20, 2016
As 2016 draws to a close, Oil & Gas Team @ McInnes Cooper offers its picks for the top three legal developments of 2016 that impacted the Atlantic Canada offshore oil & gas sector.
ENERGY SAFETY AND SECURITY ACT (ESSA) AMENDMENTS KICK IN
On February 26, 2016, the bulk of the offshore-related amendments of the Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA, formerly known as Bill C-22) took effect. With an express purpose of “accountability in accordance with the ‘polluter pays’ principle,” ESSA significantly toughens the Atlantic Canada offshore and North oil & gas sector liability regime for environmental damage.
Of most importance for many industry participants, ESSA increases the amount and range of potential liability for environmental damage. At-fault liability for damage from a spill or debris remains unlimited, but the no-fault, absolute liability limit is significantly increased from $30M to $1B in the Atlantic offshore areas.
ESSA also expands the types of damage for which operators can be liable and makes them vicariously liable for spills or debris their contractors caused; operators will need to closely review “knock-for-knock” provisions, where each party bears the cost of any damage/loss it suffers regardless of the other party’s fault, in typical offshore contracts. Heavier financial responsibility and resources requirements accompany this increase. Applicants for drilling, development and production authorizations must now provide the offshore petroleum board with unfettered access to $100M or a greater amount the board determines, and prove they have financial resources to pay the increased absolute liability limits. These limits aren’t extraordinary in the global context and won’t likely deter major participants from exploration and development investment, but they’ll make it harder for smaller participants.
The enforcement powers of the offshore petroleum boards have also expanded. More – and tougher – sanctions are available, including powers to issue administrative monetary penalties and to “name and shame” offenders. Key defences are removed and corporate directors, officers and agents are now exposed to personal liability in certain circumstances. Courts have additional sentencing options for regulatory offences and must consider new “aggravating factors” when sentencing offenders – and can now bar an operator from the offshore by prohibiting it from applying for any further interest, license or authorization for any duration it sees fit.
ESSA also goes some way to transferring responsibility to conduct environmental assessments under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA) to the boards. They now have authority to conduct the hearings necessary for these environmental assessments. However, regulations designating the offshore activities for which the boards will be responsible haven’t yet been enacted, so it remains to be seen whether the boards will assume responsibility for CEAA environmental assessments.
Importantly, ESSA also gives the offshore petroleum boards authority to disclose a broader range of previously “privileged” information. But ongoing litigation is creating uncertainty around some disclosure powers and since ESSA doesn’t clarify them, the courts will.
BALANCING PUBLIC AND OPERATOR INTERESTS IN OFFSHORE PETROLEUM RESOURCES DATA
This balance is at the heart of the dispute in Geophysical Service Incorporated v. Encana Corporation. In April 2016, Alberta’s superior court decided just where the balance lies – at least until the appeals finish.
Geophysical Services Incorporated (GSI) obtained seismic data through offshore surveys in the Atlantic and Arctic and submitted it to the National Energy and offshore petroleum boards as a condition of regulatory approval and as required by legislation. After statutory confidentiality periods expired, the boards publicly released the data. GSI started lawsuits in Alberta, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and the Federal Court against the boards, exploration, production and other companies claiming (among other things) it owned copyright in the data and the defendants infringed it by disclosing or copying it without GSI’s consent.
The Court decided two issues common to 25 Alberta cases – whether seismic data can be copyrighted and the effect of the offshore regulatory regime on that copyright. The Court agreed seismic data can be copyrighted but the offshore regulatory regime overrides the copyright law. The regulatory regime balances operators’ interest in commercializing seismic data and the public’s interest in disseminating it by allowing disclosure after a period of confidentiality to stimulate exploration and development – even if that balance seems “unfair.” The Court has since decided a photocopy company isn’t liable for copying GSI data accessed from the National Energy Board.
This first confirmation that copyright can subsist in seismic data validates industry supposition. The regulatory regime dispute, however, is far more significant and it’s not over. The Appeal Court heard (but hasn’t yet decided) GSI’s appeal in November 2016 and the case could reach the Supreme Court of Canada. If the decision survives, it will confirm the industry understanding that seismic data submitted to the boards can be freely copied after the confidentiality period expires, ending years of uncertainty and litigation. If overturned, the boards and anyone who has copied GSI’s data are exposed to significant liability (GSI’s collective claims approach $1B). Similar claims may proliferate because the regime requires the submission, and permits disclosure, of information about all sorts of topics (including exploratory, delineation and development wells). And public access to seismic data for regulatory, exploratory, research or other purposes will be threatened.
THE UN CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA (UNCLOS) PAYMENT REGIME FOR RESOURCE EXTRACTION FROM THE EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF
UNCLOS Article 82 provides for a system of payments (resembling royalties) by coastal states respecting the exploitation of non-living resources in the extended continental shelf through the International Seabed Authority (or “ISA”, the intergovernmental body tasked with regulating the international seabed area) and of distributions of those payments.
Article 82 has been “dormant” because there’s been no resource extraction from the extended continental shelf (the area beyond 200 nautical miles but still on the Continental Shelf). In 2016, the ISA commissioned a technical study of the key terms of Article 82, signalling it’s ramping up to discharge its Article 82 responsibilities in light of recent developments in offshore exploration on the extended continental shelf. This study reveals, however, there are hurdles to implementing the Article 82 regime.
Article 82 is deceptively complex to interpret. Though brief, its wording is broad and ambiguous on three key issues – member countries’ obligations to make payments through the ISA for extracting resources from the extended continental shelf; their entitlement to payments through the ISA from other member countries for such resources; and how disputes, both those between member countries and those between they and the ISA, will be resolved. Since the issue is who pays and who receives money, it’s almost certain there will be disputes. These ambiguities pose real hurdles for the implementation of the regime.
A strong academic discourse around resolving these ambiguities is well underway and will impact UNCLOS member countries. But the current state also impacts resource producers looking to expand operations farther offshore. The UNCLOS member countries, not the ISA, have the jurisdiction to authorize exploration on the extended continental shelf, and it’s up to them to comply with their obligations under UNCLOS. However, the hurdles Article 82 faces increase the potential for disputes both within and among member states, and between they and the ISA. That creates uncertainty for the governments responsible for and empowered to authorize exploration on the extended continental shelf. And government uncertainty translates into greater risk for resource producers seeking to explore, and eventually extract, resources from the extended continental shelf.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Oil & Gas Law Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2016. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Jan 25, 2023
Buzz around the potential of hydrogen as a green energy source has been growing. And the Atlantic Canadian provinces are poised to become a key…
Nov 10, 2022
October 2022 amendments to the N.S. Renewable Electricity Regulations have ushered in a new commercial net-metering program in Nova Scotia.…
Jun 24, 2022
The New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench has issued a court order to stop Indigenous fishers (all apparently members of the Wolastoqey Nation)…
Jun 6, 2022
The Federal Court’s April 22, 2022 decision in Mowi Canada West Inc. v. Canada (Fisheries, Oceans and Coast Guard) has implications for the…
Feb 3, 2022
On January 26, 2022, the British Columbia Court of Appeal extended an injunction preventing protesters from interfering with a logging…
Nov 10, 2021
On November 5, 2021, the Province of Nova Scotia passed the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act. The Act will serve as the…
Oct 29, 2021
The New Brunswick Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation, effected under the N.B. Climate Change Act, establishes specific…
Oct 19, 2021
Canada’s aquaculture industry is poised for growth but that growth is being challenged by regulatory uncertainty and a lack of confidence…
Jul 27, 2021
Canadian entities regularly contract with foreign companies to provide services in Canada. To complete its obligations under the contract, the…
Jun 1, 2021
This publication has been updated as at July 22, 2021. On May 26, 2021, the Hague District Court in the Netherlands ordered Royal Dutch Shell…
Apr 13, 2021
On April 7, 2021, the Nova Scotia government introduced Bill 97, amendments to the N.S. Electricity Act aimed at growing the solar industry in…
Jan 20, 2021
This publication has been updated as at July 8, 2022. 2020 was a year filled with challenges, including in the relationship between…
Dec 22, 2020
The long-awaited amendments to federal fisheries regulations codifying key aspects of the Department of Fisheries & Oceans (DFO) PIIFCAF…
Apr 20, 2020
As countries around the world grapple with the spread of COVID-19, global restrictions and containment measures have presented a range of…
Feb 4, 2020
Tidal developers considering responding to the FORCE Berth D procurement now have a clearer view of just what the successful proponent will get.…
Jan 15, 2020
NOTE: In December 2020, the federal government published the long-awaited final amendments to federal fisheries regulations codifying key…
Nov 22, 2019
The Environmental Emergency Regulations, effected under section 200(1) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) and in force since…
Apr 29, 2019
The growing global population is feeding global demand for seafood. Growing demand is likely to drive investment, particularly mergers and…
Jul 10, 2018
If enacted, Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation…
Jun 29, 2018
The Crown’s duty to consult Indigenous Peoples has evolved considerably since the Supreme Court of Canada’s first detailed articulation of…
Feb 20, 2018
The Canadian federal government has finally revealed how it proposes to regulate offshore renewable energy developments in federal waters. On…
Feb 20, 2018
On February 8, 2018, the Canadian federal government proposed a new Impact Assessment Act in Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment…
Feb 13, 2018
The much-anticipated Nova Scotia marine renewable energy regime finally has the force of law. First introduced over two years ago, the Nova…
Feb 9, 2018
NOTE: On June 21, 2019, Bill C-68, An Act to Amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence, took effect. On February 6, 2018, Bill…
Feb 8, 2018
Over the past 15 years, most of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions respecting Indigenous Peoples in Canada have revolved around the…
Nov 30, 2017
On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Geophysical Service Incorporated’s (GSI) application for leave to appeal the decision…
Nov 17, 2017
It’s official: as of October 31, 2017, “facilitation payments” contravene Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA).…
Nov 9, 2017
On November 3, 2017, the Newfoundland and Labrador Government published new Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations replacing the Royalty Regulations,…
Nov 7, 2017
On November 2, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada was faced with the Ktunaxa Nation’s claim that a Ministerial decision to approve a project…
Oct 11, 2017
The fourth round of NAFTA negotiations is set to start on October 11, 2017. But in the meantime, the Canada-European Union Comprehensive…
Oct 6, 2017
On October 5, 2017, the N.S. government took another step toward creating a globally competitive marine renewable energy industry and associated…
Sep 29, 2017
Atlantic Canada is at a turning point. The region’s history and economic development have historically been inextricably linked to the ocean.…
Aug 16, 2017
In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…
Jul 28, 2017
All stakeholders in any major project development already know that adequate consultation before - rather than after - a project is approved is…
Jul 11, 2017
The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) is making waves in Canada, and for good reason: it casts the net of…
May 26, 2017
On May 19, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear the appeal of the Federal Court of Appeal’s 2016 decision in Canada v Mikisew Cree…
May 11, 2017
The Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act is one of several anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws aimed at fighting corruption in the…
May 1, 2017
NOTE: On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Geophysical Service Incorporated’s (GSI) application for leave to appeal the…
Apr 20, 2017
On April 13, 2017, Canada’s federal government introduced legislation that, if passed into law, will legalize recreational cannabis in Canada.…
Apr 17, 2017
Recreational cannabis isn’t legal yet - but much of the associated stigma is already gone, usage is up and employers are feeling the workplace…
Apr 6, 2017
Adding a third jurisdiction to Gard Update’s comparison between privilege in the corporate context under U.S. and English law, McInnes Cooper…
Apr 5, 2017
NOTE: Consultants who were already lobbying and in-house lobbyists already employed by an organization when the new Act took effect were…
Mar 31, 2017
Legal uncertainty is never a good thing for industry: it’s a barrier to investment, and thus an adversary to growth. Unfortunately, the law is…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Jan 13, 2017
On January 11, 2017, Emera Inc. offered an electrifying opportunity for renewable energy developers to potentially access the New England…
Dec 15, 2016
On December 13, 2016, the Province of Nova Scotia released for comment draft regulations that will establish the Solar for Community Buildings…
Dec 7, 2016
Recently, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court denied a motion for a temporary stay of proceedings to prevent the deployment of certain tidal devices…
Nov 9, 2016
The balance between the public’s interest in accessing offshore petroleum resources data and operators’ commercial interests is at the heart…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jul 7, 2016
On July 6, 2016, the Federal Department of Fisheries and Ocean’s (DFO) accepted the Ministerial Advisory Panel (MAP) recommendation in the…
Jun 20, 2016
As of July 1, 2016, packed cargo containers to which the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), Chapter VI, Regulation…
Jun 17, 2016
In its June 16, 2016 decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City), the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s…
Jun 10, 2016
Administrative monetary penalties, or “AMPs”, are a new phenomenon in the Canadian offshore. AMPs were introduced to the Newfoundland &…
Jun 6, 2016
On June 2, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied an Alberta First Nation’s request to appeal the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of its bid…
Jun 6, 2016
Each Provincial government is under the legal duty to consult; the manner in which each carries out its legal duty to consult differs depending…
May 2, 2016
We updated this publication on May 8, 2023. “Due diligence” is a legal defence to many charges under occupational health and safety (OHS)…
Apr 21, 2016
On April 15, 2016, Bill No. 149, The Mineral Resources Act (2016) (2016 Act), passed its second reading in the NS House of Assembly. Although…
Apr 19, 2016
On April 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that Métis and “non-status Indians” are “Indians” under section 91(24) of the…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Mar 9, 2016
On January 11, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sentenced a front-line supervisor to imprisonment for 3½ years for four counts of…
Feb 15, 2016
On February 26, 2016, the bulk of the offshore-related amendments of the Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA, formerly known as Bill C-22) take…
Feb 1, 2016
On January 29, 2016, the New Brunswick Power Corporation (NB Power) kicked-off compliance with its obligations under the new Electricity from…
Dec 21, 2015
A practical and current guide created to help you navigate the increasingly important issues surrounding offshore decommissioning and…
Sep 8, 2015
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea requires parties, of which Canada is one, to make payments in respect of oil production on…
Jul 17, 2015
On the heels of National Aboriginal Day, we pause to take a look back at two significant Aboriginal law cases decided in the last year, how…
Jul 10, 2015
On April 15, 2015, British Columbia’s Court of Appeal confirmed that First Nations can make certain legal claims grounded in Aboriginal rights…
Jun 25, 2015
We updated this publication on May 9, 2023. Most people know a company itself has occupational health and safety (OHS) obligations and risks…
Dec 10, 2014
“Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR) as a concept has been floating around in business-speak for years – but stakeholders in the mining…
Jun 26, 2014
On June 26, 2014, in its groundbreaking decision on Aboriginal title in Read the SCC’s decision in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. B.C., 2014 SCC 44,…
Mar 15, 2013
Recent developments in Ontario and Yukon are an important reminder of the practical implications of the Crown’s legal Duty to Consult with…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.