Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

  • Our Team

    Our Team

    • Lawyers & Clerks
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Human Resources
    • Marketing & Business Development
    • Paraprofessional Services
  • Our Services

    Our Services

    • Service Areas
      • Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
      • Administrative Law
      • Agribusiness
      • Banking and Financial Services
      • Bankruptcy and Insolvency
      • Business Disputes
      • Business Immigration
      • Class Actions
      • Construction Law
      • Corporate and Business
      • Corporate Finance and Securities
      • Corporate Governance and Compliance
      • Cross-Border Law
      • Education Law
      • ESG (Environmental, Social, & Governance)
      • Estates and Trusts
      • Environmental Law
      • Foreign Direct Investment
      • Franchise Law
      • Health Law
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property
      • Labour and Employment
      • Litigation
      • Maritime Law
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Municipal Law
      • P3 and Infrastructure
      • Pensions and Benefits
      • Privacy, Data Protection and Cyber Security
      • Public Law
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation of Professions
      • SISIP LTD Allowances Class Action
      • Tax
      • Technology
      • View All
    • Industries
      • Cannabis
      • Construction & Property Development
      • Emerging & High Growth Companies
      • Energy & Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Government & Institutions
      • Insurance
      • Manufacturing, Processing & Sales
      • Mining
      • Ocean Economy
      • Private Clients
      • Technology
      • View All
    • More Services
      • MC Advisory
      • MC Legal Lab
  • Our Insights
  • Our Firm

    Our Firm

    • Our Values
    • Our History
    • Our Representative Work
    • Our Global Reach
    • Our News
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Collective Social Responsibility
    • Pro Bono Program
  • Our Careers

    Our Careers

    • Lawyer Opportunities
    • Business Professional Opportunities
    • Paralegal & Legal Assistant Opportunities
    • Summer Student & Articling Opportunities
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Collective Social Responsibility
  • 1.866.439.6246
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Stay Updated
  • Contact Us
  • LexMundi World Ready
  • Privacy Policy
  • http://linkedin.com
  • http://facebook.com
  • http://twitter.com
  • 1.866.439.6246
Home > Our Insights > Proposed Fisheries Regulation Amendments Target Fish Processors & Buyers
Publication

Proposed Fisheries Regulation Amendments Target Fish Processors & Buyers

Published:

January 15, 2020

Author(s):

  • Sarah Campbell
  • Daniel Watt

Share

Print

NOTE: In December 2020, the federal government published the long-awaited final amendments to federal fisheries regulations codifying key aspects of the Department of Fisheries & Oceans (DFO) PIIFCAF policies. Learn more about the final amendments at Final Fisheries Regulation Amendments: 3 Key Issues Addressed.

The Fall 2019 re-election of the Liberal government means the proposed amendments to federal fisheries regulations remain a concern for industry participants. The federal Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard published the draft text of proposed amendments to the Atlantic Fishery Regulations (AFR) and the Maritime Provinces Fishery Regulations (MPFR) along with a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement on July 6, 2019. However, the government has, to date, not implemented the amendments. The delay was due, in part, to the intervening federal election. But with the government that proposed the amendments still in power (albeit now sitting as a minority government), the amendments are still in play.

Here are three key issues the proposed amendments to the Regulations raise for fish harvesters, processors and buyers.

1. Restrictions on Use or Control of Licence by Third Parties

The proposed amendments target arrangements that transfer license rights and privileges from license holders to third parties. In the Statement, the Minister notes the perceived narrowness of the definition of “Controlling Agreement” under the DFO’s Policy for Preserving the Independence of the Inshore Fleet in Canada’s Atlantic Fisheries (PIIFCAF) and the evolution of agreements with third parties to achieve PIIFCAF compliance while still maintaining third-party control or influence over the “licence and the activities authorized under it”. DFO’s 2018 consultation paper on proposed amendments to the AFR originally proposed that “Independent Core Licence holders must retain use and control over rights and privileges conveyed by the inshore licence(s) issued in their name”. However, in response to concerns identified in the consultation process, DFO decided to focus the new restrictions specifically on processors and buyers. This would allow for continued flexibility for structuring in corporate groups that don’t involve processors and buyers, but would restrict the types of agreements in which processors and buyers could engage going forward.

Broad Application. The breath of the proposed definitions of “fish buyer” and “fish processor” will likely preclude any conceivable corporate structures that would indirectly make licence rights available to processors and buyers. In addition to the holders of provincial fish buying or processing licences, the definitions also include: a person who holds a right or interest in the licence-holding corporation (which includes, but is broader than, shareholders); a corporation in which a licence holder holds a right or interest; and any person over whom they exercise direct or indirect control. These proposed new restrictions on buyers and processors apply to:

  • An inshore fishing licence that names an operator and is held by an Independent Core licence holder (other than a license to fish for species excluded in the existing regulations).
  • An inshore fishing licence that doesn’t name an operator and is held by an Independent Core licence holder.

However, this restriction doesn’t apply where a person exercises their rights as a creditor respecting a security in the licence under provincial laws.

Existing Arrangements. Industry participants will be familiar with the regulatory history under PIIFCAF, under which licence holders had until April 12, 2014 to terminate any Controlling Agreements. If the proposed amendments take effect, parties to any agreements with processors or buyers will need to review arrangements that replaced prior Controlling Agreements, or into which they’ve entered since, to determine if compliance with the amended Regulations. Going forward, parties will need to consider what constitutes “use or control of rights or privileges conferred under a licence” and their transfer, which the proposed Regulations don’t define. The Statement describes the “rights and privileges” under a licence as including (but not limited to) all of these:

  • A right to engage in an exclusive fishery under the conditions imposed by the licence.
  • A proprietary right to the fish caught under the licence and the decision-making over benefits resulting from their catch.
  • Privileges granted through policy, such as the ability to make requests for substitute-operators, licence renewal, licence re-issuance or quota transfers.

It is possible that some existing commercial arrangements would violate the amendments, requiring parties to restructure them to comply. However, there are other legitimate arrangements among processors and harvesters that comply with PIIFCAF – and may comply with the (proposed) amendments. In its PIIFCAF – Information Note, DFO notes that PIIFCAF wasn’t designed to hinder the ability of fish harvesters to raise capital, and discusses whether certain commercial arrangements would constitute Controlling Agreements, including: loans requiring payment upon licence transfer; penalty clauses; powers of attorney and rights of first refusal; and supply agreements where a lender loans money on the condition that fish harvesters land their product with the lender. If the amended Regulations are implemented, parties to such arrangements will need to consider if “use or control of the rights or privileges” would occur in the same situations.

Enforcement. By effecting the proposed amendments as regulations rather than policy, the proposed restrictions will be enforceable under the Fisheries Act. DFO’s ability to enforce PIIFCAF, which is departmental policy rather than law, is limited to imposing conditions on, suspending or terminating licences of harvesters that are party to Controlling Agreements. However, once the proposed restrictions are effected, entering into prohibited agreements with processors and buyers will constitute an offence under the Fisheries Act. As a result, harvesters, processors and buyers that enter into non-compliant agreements could, if convicted, be subject to sanctions including fines or imprisonment, in addition to any restrictions on or loss of licences. In the Statement’s commentary, the Minister notes the prohibition against the transfer of rights and privileges under a licence to buyers and processors would be “enforced though established departmental enforcement approaches and procedures.”

2. Issuance of Licences Only to Individuals (or Wholly Owned Corporations) Who Personally Fish the Licence

The proposed amendments will codify DFO’s existing Owner-Operator policies requiring that DFO issue licences in the inshore and coastal sectors only to individual fish harvesters (or wholly owned companies) and that licence holders personally fish the license. The Minister cited this as a response to stakeholder interest in DFO adopting a more stringent approach to upholding the Owner-Operator Policy and the Fleet Separation Policy.

Existing Policy. DFO’s Owner-Operator Policy is embedded in Sections 5 and 8 of the Maritimes Region Commercial Fisheries Licensing Policy and in Section 22 of the Commercial Fisheries Licensing Policy for the Gulf Region. These policies currently provide that licences are issued in the name of an individual fish harvester (or, for the inshore, their wholly owned company in accordance with the Policy on issuing licences to companies) and that the harvester must “personally fish the licences issued to them”.

Codification of Policy. The proposed amendments mandate that non-exempted licences can only be issued to: an individual, or their estate or succession; or a corporation, all of the shares of which belong to one individual. The amendments go on to require that in respect of non-exempted licences (or an inshore licence in which an operator is not named that is held by an Independent Core licence holder), the licence holder, the operator named in the licence, or a substitute operator must personally carry out the activities authorities authorized under the licence.

Enforcement.  These requirements will similarly be enforceable under the Fisheries Act. The Statement notes that fishery officers would enforce the proposed amendments pertaining to the Owner-Operator provision through regular on-the-water inspections, ensuring the licence holder is present on the vessel or DFO has authorized a substitute-operator.

3. Exempted Licences & Grandfathering

The Statement confirms that all existing exemptions under the current policies will be maintained – and confirms when grandfathering will be lost.

Categories. To manage the existing exemptions and specify application of the new prohibitions, the proposed Atlantic Fishery Regulations (AFR) amendments set out the following categories of licences:

(a) Inshore Independent Core Licence other than groundfish fixed gear ITQ 45-65’, groundfish mobile gear ITQ <65’, herring purse seine, Full Bay scallop, Scotian Shelf shrimp mobile gear ITQ <65, swordfish longline and certain tuna, bluefin tuna, and sculpin.

(b) Coastal Licences, other than certain herring or mackerel.

(c) Inshore Independent Core Licence in which an operator is not named.

(d) Inshore Licence in which an operator is named that is held by the head of a non-core enterprise.

(e) Inshore Licence in which an operator is not named that is held by the head of a non-core enterprise.

(f) Inshore licence for a pre-1989 company, unless an operator is not named in the licence, or the corporation held an inshore fishing licence before January 1, 1979.

The proposed Maritime Provinces Fishery Regulations (MPFR) amendments set out in the same categories of licences for paragraphs (c) to (f), but the exceptions in paragraphs (a) and (b) differ.

Exceptions & Grandfathering.  The carve outs in paragraph (a) to the AFR categories codify the existing exempted fleets under PIIFCAF, plus certain tuna, bluefin tuna and sculpin.  Paragraph (f) to the AFR categories recognizes the existing grandfathering for pre-1979 corporations and pre-1989 companies. The categories also ensure the proposed Regulations maintain the existing exceptions for: licence holders that were authorized to designate an operator; fish harvesters associations that receive allocations; Eastern Nova Scotia snow crab multi-shareholder companies; and certain Indigenous organizations. Midshore and offshore licences are not subject to the proposed amendments.

Loss of Grandfathering. In relation to loss of grandfathering, the Statement notes that many of the existing exceptions granted over the years are only valid as long as the particular licence holder remains the holder of the excepted licence. This means that, eventually, most licences would be issued to an Independent Core licence holder, and be subject to all of the proposed amendments. Specifically, the Statement notes that the licences described in categories (c), (d) and (e) will not continue to be exempted when transferred, namely any:

  • Inshore Independent Core Licence in which an operator is not named.
  • Inshore Licence in which an operator is named that is held by the head of a non-core enterprise.
  • Inshore Licence in which an operator is not named that is held by the head of a non-core enterprise.

With respect to pre-1989 companies (category (f)), the Statement notes that the corporation’s majority shareholder can’t change and must fish the licence personally; upon reissuance to a new licence holder, these licences can be reissued to another pre-1989 corporation, or to an Independent Core licence holder.


Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the The Ocean Economy Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.


McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2020. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s

Share

Print
View Related Content

Related Lawyers

  • Daniel Watt

    Daniel Watt

    Partner

  • Sarah Campbell

    Sarah Campbell

    Chair of Promotion of Women Committee, Partner

Related Industries

  • Ocean Economy
  • Fish, Seafood & Aquaculture Industry

Related Publications

View All Publications
  • Court Rules in Favour of Non-Indigenous Interests in Lucrative Elver Fishery

    Jun 24, 2022

    The New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench has issued a court order to stop Indigenous fishers (all apparently members of the Wolastoqey Nation)…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Aquaculture Regulatory Decisions: The Critical Role of Industry Engagement

    Jun 6, 2022

    The Federal Court’s April 22, 2022 decision in Mowi Canada West Inc. v. Canada (Fisheries, Oceans and Coast Guard) has implications for the…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Webinar | Growing Out Atlantic Canada’s Aquaculture Industry

    Oct 19, 2021

    Canada’s aquaculture industry is poised for growth but that growth is being challenged by regulatory uncertainty and a lack of confidence…

    Read More
    Webinar
  • Hiring a Foreign Company to Provide Services in Canada? 3 Immigration Issues

    Jul 27, 2021

    Canadian entities regularly contract with foreign companies to provide services in Canada. To complete its obligations under the contract, the…

    Read More
    Publication
  • The Indigenous Right to a Moderate Livelihood: A Need for Clarity

    Jan 20, 2021

    This publication has been updated as at July 8, 2022. 2020 was a year filled with challenges, including in the relationship between…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Final Fisheries Regulation Amendments: 3 Key Issues Addressed

    Dec 22, 2020

    The long-awaited amendments to federal fisheries regulations codifying key aspects of the Department of Fisheries & Oceans (DFO) PIIFCAF…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Coping with COVID-19: The Impact on Contractual Performance in the Energy & Natural Resources Sector

    Apr 20, 2020

    As countries around the world grapple with the spread of COVID-19, global restrictions and containment measures have presented a range of…

    Read More
    Publication
  • N.S. Battens Down Marine Renewable Energy Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

    Feb 4, 2020

    Tidal developers considering responding to the FORCE Berth D procurement now have a clearer view of just what the successful proponent will get.…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Atlantic Canada Seafood Processing Mergers & Acquisitions: 3 Due Diligence Tips

    Apr 29, 2019

    The growing global population is feeding global demand for seafood. Growing demand is likely to drive investment, particularly mergers and…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Dan Watt in Energy Regulation Quarterly | The Impact Assessment Act, Canadian Energy Regulator Act and Offshore Energy: A View from Atlantic Canada

    Jul 10, 2018

    If enacted, Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation…

    Read More
    Publication
  • The Evolving Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: N.S. Court Recognizes a “Duty of Enforcement Consultation” in R. v. Martin

    Jun 29, 2018

    The Crown’s duty to consult Indigenous Peoples has evolved considerably since the Supreme Court of Canada’s first detailed articulation of…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Bill C-69 & The New Federal Offshore Renewable Energy Regime

    Feb 20, 2018

    The Canadian federal government has finally revealed how it proposes to regulate offshore renewable energy developments in federal waters. On…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Bill C-69 & the New Federal Impact Assessment Act: The Impact on the Role of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB)

    Feb 20, 2018

    On February 8, 2018, the Canadian federal government proposed a new Impact Assessment Act in Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Navigating the N.S. Marine Renewable Energy Regime: What Project Developers Need to Know

    Feb 13, 2018

    The much-anticipated Nova Scotia marine renewable energy regime finally has the force of law.  First introduced over two years ago, the Nova…

    Read More
    Publication
  • A Whale of a Change: 5 of the Key Changes DFO Proposes to Canada’s Fisheries Act

    Feb 9, 2018

    NOTE: On June 21, 2019, Bill C-68, An Act to Amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence, took effect.  On February 6, 2018, Bill…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Balance Between Public & Operator Interests in Offshore Petroleum Resources Data is Set

    Nov 30, 2017

    On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Geophysical Service Incorporated’s (GSI) application for leave to appeal the decision…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Newfoundland & Labrador Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations November 1, 2017: Key Changes to the Offshore Regime

    Nov 9, 2017

    On November 3, 2017, the Newfoundland and Labrador Government published new Offshore Oil Royalty Regulations replacing the Royalty Regulations,…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Canada Has Other Fish to Fry Between NAFTA Negotiation Rounds: CETA Provisionally Effective September 21, 2017

    Oct 11, 2017

    The fourth round of NAFTA negotiations is set to start on October 11, 2017. But in the meantime, the Canada-European Union Comprehensive…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Proposed N.S. Marine Renewable Energy Act Amendments: New Demonstration Permit for Marine Renewable Energy in Wind & Waves

    Oct 6, 2017

    On October 5, 2017, the N.S. government took another step toward creating a globally competitive marine renewable energy industry and associated…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Charting a Course for Good Governance of Canada’s Emerging Ocean Economy | Offshore Aquaculture and Ocean-based Renewable Energy

    Sep 29, 2017

    Atlantic Canada is at a turning point. The region’s history and economic development have historically been inextricably linked to the ocean.…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Making Waves: What CETA means for Atlantic Canadian Fisheries

    Jul 11, 2017

    The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) is making waves in Canada, and for good reason: it casts the net of…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Appeal Court Maintains Balance Between Public & Operator Interests in Offshore Petroleum Resources Data

    May 1, 2017

    NOTE: On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Geophysical Service Incorporated’s (GSI) application for leave to appeal the…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Register Before You Lobby in N.B. under Lobbyists’ Registration Act

    Apr 5, 2017

    NOTE: Consultants who were already lobbying and in-house lobbyists already employed by an organization when the new Act took effect were…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Go Deep: How International Legal Reform Can Prevent Legal Uncertainty from Hindering Offshore Wind & Aquaculture Growth

    Mar 31, 2017

    Legal uncertainty is never a good thing for industry: it’s a barrier to investment, and thus an adversary to growth. Unfortunately, the law is…

    Read More
    Publication
  • The Top Three Atlantic Canada Offshore Legal Developments of 2016

    Dec 20, 2016

    As 2016 draws to a close, Oil & Gas Team @ McInnes Cooper offers its picks for the top three legal developments of 2016 that impacted the…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Public & operator interests in offshore petroleum resources data: Where will the balance be struck? in Geophysical Service Incorporated (GSI) v. Encana Corporation

    Nov 9, 2016

    The balance between the public’s interest in accessing offshore petroleum resources data and operators’ commercial interests is at the heart…

    Read More
    Publication
  • DFO Decides “Last In, First Out” Policy (LIFO) is Out

    Jul 7, 2016

    On July 6, 2016, the Federal Department of Fisheries and Ocean’s (DFO) accepted the Ministerial Advisory Panel (MAP) recommendation in the…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Weigh Now or Weight Later: New Cargo Container Verified Gross Mass (VGM) Rules Effective July 1, 2016

    Jun 20, 2016

    As of July 1, 2016, packed cargo containers to which the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), Chapter VI, Regulation…

    Read More
    Publication
  • FAQs About AMPs (Administrative Monetary Penalties) in the Canadian Offshore

    Jun 10, 2016

    Administrative monetary penalties, or “AMPs”, are a new phenomenon in the Canadian offshore. AMPs were introduced to the Newfoundland &…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA): 7 Key Changes Toughen Up Atlantic Offshore and North Oil & Gas Regulatory Regime

    Feb 15, 2016

    On February 26, 2016, the bulk of the offshore-related amendments of the Energy Safety and Security Act (ESSA, formerly known as Bill C-22) take…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Best Practices

    Dec 21, 2015

    A practical and current guide created to help you navigate the increasingly important issues surrounding offshore decommissioning and…

    Read More
    Publication
  • University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy Research Paper – Canada, The Law of the Sea Treaty and International Payments: Where Will the Money Come From?

    Sep 8, 2015

    The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea requires parties, of which Canada is one, to make payments in respect of oil production on…

    Read More
    Publication
  • The Changing Face of Aboriginal Law: 1 Short Year, 2 Big Court Decisions, 3 Key Implications for the Energy & Natural Resources Sector

    Jul 17, 2015

    On the heels of National Aboriginal Day, we pause to take a look back at two significant Aboriginal law cases decided in the last year, how…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Unproven Aboriginal Rights Enough For Lawsuit Against Private Industry

    Jul 10, 2015

    On April 15, 2015, British Columbia’s Court of Appeal confirmed that First Nations can make certain legal claims grounded in Aboriginal rights…

    Read More
    Publication
  • Legal Update: The Duty to Consult – Important Lessons from Canada’s Mining Sector

    Mar 15, 2013

    Recent developments in Ontario and Yukon are an important reminder of the practical implications of the Crown’s legal Duty to Consult with…

    Read More
    Publication

Stay Updated

Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.

Connect With Us:
  • Follow us on Twitter @mcinnescooper
  • Like us on Facebook @mcinnescooperlaw
  • Join us on LinkedIn @mcinnes-cooper
  • 1.866.439.6246
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright © 2023 — McInnes Cooper
Lex Mundi Logo MC Advisory Logo