December 23, 2017
Parents often threaten their children that if their behaviour did not improve they will get a lump of coal in their Christmas stockings. On December 20, 2017 a well-known accounting firm received just that from the Supreme Court of Canada, namely a judgment against it for over $40 Million – though the lump was only half the size it was initially. The Supreme Court’s decision in Livent v. Deloitte is an especially stark reminder of the importance to both clients and their professional advisors of a proper understanding of what a professional services firm is undertaking to do for its client. That understanding must be documented carefully to prevent disputes about the scope of the advisor’s undertaking from arising in the future. When the scope of the undertaking is clear, it is unlikely an auditor or other professional services can argue successfully it did not owe its client a duty of care in respect of services reasonably encompassed within that scope. In this case, the scope of the auditor’s undertaking was everything.
Livent was a well-known entertainment company that specialized in the vertical integration of live theatre productions. As the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court noted, “it brought the entire enterprise, from production to performance, under one roof – a roof that Livent, as a proprietor of theatre properties, also owned.” To show Livent was a success, its two principal shareholders, Drabinsky and Gottlieb, and “their associates cooked the books.” From 1989 to 1998, Deloitte LLP acted as auditor for Livent and its predecessors. In 1997 the auditor helped Livent prepare and approved a press release that misrepresented the financial impact of a particular transaction and provided a “comfort letter” to support a substantial debenture underwriting. In 1998, the auditor provided a “clean” audit report with respect to Livent’s 1997 financial statements. Livent subsequently sued its auditor in negligence claiming that the auditor’s failure to detect the frauds of Drabinsky and Gottlieb caused Livent to suffer substantial losses. The trial court decided the auditor was negligent in respect of the press release, the comfort letter and the 1997 audit and ordered the auditor to pay approximately $84 Million to Livent. The auditor appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal, but failed. The auditor appealed further to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court confirmed Deloitte’s liability – but reduced the damages award to $40 Million.
Negligence
A party that makes a claim against another based on negligence must establish four things:
The Supreme Court’s decision in Livent was concerned only with the first question: did the auditor owe a duty of care to Livent? Canadian courts use a two-stage analysis (the so-called “Anns/Cooper” framework) to determine whether a duty of care exists:
The majority of the Court provides a very helpful review of the principles governing how courts should apply this two-stage analysis. This Alert will focus on how a badly split Supreme Court dealt with the first issue, the existence of the duty of care. Four judges accepted that the auditor owed a duty of care to Livent, but decided it was only liable for the loss flowing from the negligently performed audit and not for the loss resulting from the press releases or the comfort letter; three would have held that the auditor was not liable for any of Livent’s losses.
Prima Facie Duty of Care
This stage of the analysis requires the court to ascertain whether the plaintiff and the auditor are in a relationship of proximity which is such a close and direct relationship that it would be “just and fair” to impose a duty of care. The courts have adopted a number of techniques to make that determination.
Prior Recognition of a Duty of Care. They first use a shortcut: if the relationship is the same or analogous to a relationship the courts have previously recognized as giving rise to a duty of care, the analysis need go no further and they accept a duty of care exists. Livent pointed to the Court’s earlier decision in Hercules Managements Ltd. v. Ernst & Young where the Court recognized that an auditor owed a duty of care to its client in the performance of a statutory audit. Livent argued that because the Court recognized a duty of care in that case, it necessarily followed that its auditor owed it a duty of care in this case. However, the majority of the Supreme Court said it was not as simple as that: the prior recognition of a duty of care was not to be accepted without question. A court must be attentive to the factors that justified the recognition of the duty of care in the earlier case. The court in the subsequent case must determine whether the relationship was “in fact, truly the same as, or analogous to, that which was previously recognized.” Furthermore, the fact that a duty of care has been recognized between an auditor and its client does not mean that a duty of care exists for all purposes.
Full Proximity Analysis. If the case does not fit into an existing category recognizing a duty of care, the court must undertake a “full proximity analysis”: it must examine all relevant factors arising from the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, including “expectations, representations, reliance, and the property or other interests involved as well as any statutory obligations.” Where the claim is for negligent misrepresentation or performance of a service (the most common allegations in professional negligence cases), two factors are determinative: the defendant’s undertaking and the plaintiff’s reliance. Where the defendant undertakes to provide a representation or service in circumstances that invite the plaintiff’s reasonable reliance, the defendant becomes obligated to take reasonable care, and the plaintiff has a right to rely on the defendant’s undertaking to do so. These corollary rights and obligations create a relationship of proximity.
Scope of the Undertaking is Key. A key factor in this proximity analysis – and the determinative factor in this case – is the scope of the defendant’s undertaking of responsibility: if the plaintiff’s reliance falls outside the scope of the defendant’s undertaking of responsibility, it is necessarily outside the defendant’s duty of care. In other words the “defendant cannot be liable for a risk of injury against which he did not undertake to protect.” Here, the scope of the auditor’s undertaking was determinative.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Financial Services Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2017. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Apr 25, 2023
Most initially believed the Underused Housing Tax Act would impose reporting and tax obligations only on non-Canadian and non-permanent…
Apr 13, 2023
A Will is a key ingredient of any estate plan - and one of the most important documents a person ever signs. It allows a person to control how…
Mar 2, 2023
All businesses need written contracts. Determining what written contracts are essential depends on many factors, including the nature of the…
Jan 27, 2023
The New Brunswick government has proposed significant amendments to the New Brunswick Business Corporations Act. Bill 24 An Act to Amend the…
Jan 19, 2023
We updated this publication on March 29, 2023. Beginning April 30, 2023, both Canadian and non-Canadian trustees, partners of a partnership,…
Jan 18, 2023
Regulatory bodies across Canada are finding themselves subject to increased scrutiny in light of concerns surrounding workforce shortages,…
Nov 8, 2022
The October 3, 2022, decision of the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal to dismiss the decision of the Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy…
Sep 28, 2022
On August 25, 2022, the P.E.I. Supreme Court dismissed an appeal of the P.E.I. College of Registered Nurses Hearing Committee in Llewellyn v.…
Jul 18, 2022
The Supreme Court of Canada’s “Jordan” framework, introducing strict timelines for determining unreasonable delay in the context of…
Jul 12, 2022
Lawyers and accountants advise clients on options for organizing their personal and business affairs in a tax-efficient way. Clients enter into…
May 20, 2022
On May 22, 2010 (affectionately known as “Bitcoin Pizza Day”), a Floridian bought two Papa John's pizzas with Bitcoin. The day is famous…
May 2, 2022
On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…
Feb 23, 2022
On April 1, 2022, changes to the Newfoundland and Labrador Corporations Act proposed in Bill 24 An Act to Amend the Corporations Act will take…
Jan 25, 2022
More and more people are using smart contracts: the global smart contracts market was valued at USD $145M in 2020; it’s projected to be valued…
Aug 5, 2021
On July 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision protecting the status of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) as a…
Jun 24, 2021
Many employers use equity compensation plans like employee stock option plans to attract, motivate, and retain talent. One reason stock options…
Mar 31, 2021
Close to five million Canadians who didn’t usually work from home, did so in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Even as public health…
Mar 1, 2021
The Supreme Court of Canada continues to develop and clarify the organizing principle of good faith performance in contract law. In its 2014…
Feb 12, 2021
Estate planning is a customized process; the goal is to create a plan that’s best for a person’s unique situation. And while all estate…
Feb 12, 2021
An ever increasing number of people originally from China now reside in Canada. It is more important than ever to recognize and understand the…
Jan 18, 2021
The Supreme Court of Canada, in the 2014 case of Bhasin v. Hrynew, recognized a general organizing principle of good faith performance in…
Dec 10, 2020
The current state of closed Canadian borders and stringent travel restrictions in efforts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to be the…
Dec 7, 2020
All trusts that continue to be in effect past December 31, 2020, will be subject to new reporting requirements and harsh non-compliance…
Oct 21, 2020
For business owners, estate planning is directed at protecting the business’s legacy as well as the financial security of both family members…
Oct 20, 2020
Estate planning is directed at protecting your assets and your loved ones from creditors and unnecessary income tax or probate fees, and your…
Oct 5, 2020
On October 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the existence and application of the anti-deprivation rule in Canadian bankruptcy law.…
Sep 29, 2020
We updated this publication on December 22, 2022. It’s a forgone conclusion that diversity in thought and in leadership makes good business…
Jun 12, 2020
The financial technology (Fintech) industry uses technology to support and enhance financial and banking services.
May 11, 2020
McInnes Cooper partner Michael Melvin and Student-at-Law Myriam Whalen provide a detailed Legal Digest in the Spring 2020 Edition of The…
May 11, 2020
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released a much-awaited decision regarding the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). The CCAA is…
Mar 10, 2020
The global COVID-19 (a.k.a. Coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2) outbreak has implications for many commercial relationships, its evolving nature and…
Jan 30, 2020
NOTE: The new tax rules for employee stock option plans take effect on July 1, 2021. Learn more at Limited Options: New Employee Stock Option…
Jun 26, 2019
Information disclosure is a key theme that emerges from Canada’s new cannabis regulatory regime: the government wants lots of information from…
May 21, 2019
We updated this publication on February 17, 2023. As of June 13, 2019, private companies incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations…
Jan 31, 2019
On January 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada considered, for the first time, “Henson trusts” and the nature of a disabled…
Sep 10, 2018
As of January 2019, incorporating a limited company in N.S. will be more economical. On September 7, 2018, the N.S. government announced it’s…
Jul 18, 2018
This publication has been updated as at January 26, 2023. Prince Edward Island corporations were formerly governed by the P.E.I. Companies…
Jun 12, 2018
This publication has been updated as at July 8, 2022. Changes to the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) over the past several years have…
Apr 2, 2018
Equity compensation plans are a valuable and versatile tool for many corporations, from early-stage startups to established blue-chips.…
Feb 15, 2018
Mandatory interlocutory injunctions - court orders, made in the context of a lawsuit, that a party take positive action as opposed to refrain…
Jan 12, 2018
Whether a provincial court will grant police a “production order” under the Criminal Code of Canada requiring a non-Canadian company to…
Dec 22, 2017
Blockchain technology has already been a transformative force in a number of sectors. Its most prominent use to date has been as the…
Nov 20, 2017
October 2, 2017 marked the end of the consultation period relating to the taxation of private corporation proposals the Department of Finance…
Nov 2, 2017
On October 19, 2017, the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) announced it had adopted amendments to its Company Manual. Originally proposed in Spring…
Oct 31, 2017
On October 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that a bank that pays out on a fraudulent cheque has the protection of section 20(5)…
Sep 22, 2017
Canada’s most important trading relationship is – in all likelihood – about to change: the current U.S. administration has put the future…
Aug 28, 2017
Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor’s bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown’s priority to proceeds…
Aug 16, 2017
In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…
Aug 4, 2017
On July 18, 2017, Canada’s Minister of Finance released proposed changes to the Income Tax Act (Canada) that, if implemented, will mark one of…
Jul 17, 2017
A corporation does not always sail in calm or safe waters. Cash shortages, unattainable or unmet goals, Board disagreements over the best course…
Jul 13, 2017
When growing your business, you face many decisions, including choosing the business structure that is right for you. Your legal team can be…
Jun 23, 2017
On June 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that in a contest between the choice of forum clause in Facebook’s online terms of use…
Jun 5, 2017
On June 2, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that where a plaintiff advances a claim for negligently caused psychological or psychiatric…
Apr 21, 2017
In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…
Apr 20, 2017
On April 13, 2017, Canada’s federal government introduced legislation that, if passed into law, will legalize recreational cannabis in Canada.…
Apr 17, 2017
Recreational cannabis isn’t legal yet - but much of the associated stigma is already gone, usage is up and employers are feeling the workplace…
Apr 6, 2017
Adding a third jurisdiction to Gard Update’s comparison between privilege in the corporate context under U.S. and English law, McInnes Cooper…
Mar 30, 2017
Social media platforms, like Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Facebook and GooglePlus, arguably have more followers and are more closely…
Mar 30, 2017
There are very few examples of a Canadian court interpreting and opining on the provisions of an information technology contract. So the Ontario…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Jan 20, 2017
Connections between Canadians and the U.S. have never been as numerous or transparent as they are now: many Canadians own U.S. property, have…
Dec 22, 2016
Effective January 1, 2017, the kinds of trusts that can claim the Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) will be limited. Now, the PRE allows…
Dec 14, 2016
On December 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified when a court can rectify a transaction that has had unintended tax consequences for…
Nov 28, 2016
On November 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided privilege wins again - twice. In two separate decisions - Lizotte v. Aviva Insurance…
Nov 22, 2016
On November 17, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada decided a mortgagee has the mortgagor’s implied consent to disclose its discharge statement…
Nov 22, 2016
Canada’s most important trading relationship might undergo some change with the results of the 2016 U.S. election. Facilitating cross-border…
Sep 23, 2016
On September 15, 2016, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal clarified the province’s statutory regime governing both the exercise of a lender’s…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Aug 15, 2016
The standards expected of market participants are steadily increasing in response to demand to address white collar crime – including…
Aug 9, 2016
This publication has been updated as at January 27, 2023. A key legal decision in starting or growing your business is choosing the…
Jun 30, 2016
As of June 25, 2016, provincially regulated workers and employers in Nova Scotia, Quebec, BC and Saskatchewan can participate in Pooled…
Jun 30, 2016
The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…
Jun 20, 2016
Real estate vendors and purchasers have high expectations of their realtors – and they don’t often hesitate to pursue legal action against…
Jun 6, 2016
On June 3, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada, in two related decisions, strengthened the legal protection of solicitor-client privilege in…
Jun 6, 2016
On June 30, 2016, amendments to National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions and related changes to Companion Policy 45-106 Prospectus…
May 31, 2016
You’re on a tight timeline to issue a press release. You finish your draft and ‘cut & paste’ your standard “forward-looking…
May 9, 2016
On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that a mortgage imposing a higher interest rate in the event of default and reserving a…
May 2, 2016
Amendments changing the early warning reporting system take effect on May 9, 2016, provided all necessary approvals are obtained (except in…
May 2, 2016
Amendments changing the early warning reporting system take effect on May 9, 2016, provided all necessary approvals are obtained (except in…
Apr 15, 2016
On April 14, 2016, Canada’s federal Justice Minister proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Apr 12, 2016
Federal Budget 2016 proposed to significantly reduce the benefit of and access to the Small Business Deduction. The Small Business Deduction…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Oct 23, 2015
Subsection 55(2) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) is an anti-avoidance provision intended to prevent capital gains stripping by deeming an…
Oct 23, 2015
Incorporation offers legal advantages to sole proprietors of small businesses, including certain tax advantages. However, when a corporation…
Oct 19, 2015
Access to sufficient capital to fund operations, research and development, and other costs is a key challenge for start-ups and for some small…
Jul 30, 2015
Note: On June 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the National Alliance’s application for leave to appeal the New Brunswick Court…
Mar 30, 2015
Hindsight is 20/20. Lawyers can’t always predict the outcome of a legal claim. But when a dispute between an investment client and her…
Feb 9, 2015
NOTE: On April 14, 2016, the federal government proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Nov 14, 2014
On November 13, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) effected a significant development in Canadian contract law by recognizing the…
Sep 16, 2014
This publication has been updated as at August 25, 2022. Many believe that only public companies or large, established companies with many…
Sep 11, 2014
The Canadian federal government has been concerned for some time about “treaty shopping” by non-residents – the practice of non-residents…
May 22, 2014
This publication has been updated as at February 17, 2021. Trusts offer a very useful estate planning solution for a wide variety of special…
Apr 29, 2014
Lenders are often faced with a situation where a customer (Borrower) approaches them for funds to complete an acquisition of the shares of a…
Nov 1, 2013
Recent decisions of securities regulators and amendments to Canadian securities laws demonstrate regulators' lowered tolerance for insiders who…
Aug 28, 2013
A general security agreement (GSA) is the most common form of personal property security used in the Atlantic Provinces to secure commercial…
Jun 7, 2013
In Franchise Canada’s Spring 2013 “Viewpoints” feature, McInnes Cooper franchise lawyer Michael Melvin answers this question for…
Dec 16, 2011
In a unanimous decision rendered by Justice Rothstein, the Supreme Court of Canada today dismissed the appeal of Copthorne Holdings Limited,…
Mar 7, 2011
Effective April 1, 2011, the fishing licensing policy for the Atlantic Canada and Quebec inshore fishery will change to allow inshore fishing…
Oct 1, 2010
McInnes Cooper franchise lawyer Michael Melvin highlights some of the significant features of the Disclosure Documents Regulation and the…
May 31, 2010
In Franchise Canada’s May/June 2010 “Ask A Legal Expert” feature, McInnes Cooper franchise lawyer Michael Melvin answers this question for…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.