Publications

NS Workers’ Compensation Board Issues New Policy for Psychological Injury Claims

Published:

April 7, 2014

Author(s):

Michael Murphy

On March 31, 2014 the NS Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) issued a new policy applicable to its adjudication of psychological injury claims under the NS Workers’ Compensation Act. The new policy clarifies the WCB’s approach to compensation for stress resulting from an “acute reaction to a traumatic event”:

Criteria. Claimants must satisfy four criteria – including the occurrence of a “traumatic event” as defined in the new policy – to be eligible.
Test. The WCB will apply an “objective” test.
Effective Date. The new policy took effect on March 25, 2014.
Employer Costs. There is a risk the new policy could, ultimately, lead to increased employer costs.

The Act defines “accident” as including stress that results from an “acute reaction to a traumatic event”. However, the WCB had no clearly defined approach to deal with such a claim when it did not arise from a compensable physical injury. This new policy clarifies the entitlement of workers covered by the provincial Act to compensation for stress resulting from an “acute reaction to a traumatic event”:

Criteria. A claimant must satisfy four criteria to be eligible for compensation for “psychological injury”:

there must be a “traumatic event”; psychological conditions arising out of the usual workplace issues, such as a change in working conditions or disciplinary decisions, are not compensable;
the event must arise in the course of employment;
the response to the event must cause the worker to suffer from a recognized mental or physical condition described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM); and
the condition must be diagnosed in accordance with the DSM by a health care provider (i.e. psychiatrist or clinically trained registered psychologist).

“Traumatic Event”. A “traumatic event” is defined as a direct personal experience of an event that is sudden, frightening or shocking, with a specific time and place and involving actual or threatened death or serious injury to oneself or others, or a threat to one’s physical integrity. Examples include:

witnessing a horrific accident;
being involved in a hostage taking; or
witnessing an armed robbery.

Harassment and Bullying. The WCB opted not to include harassment and bullying as examples of traumatic events – but the report indicates that extreme workplace harassment could be compensable if it meets the definition of a “traumatic event”.

Test. The WCB will assess whether an event is a “traumatic event(s)” objectively: would a reasonable person have reacted to the event in the same way as the claimant?

No Change. The updated policy does not change the WCB’s approach to:

“Acute” Reaction. A “cumulative response” to traumatic events is not compensable; an “acute reaction” is still required though the acute reaction may arise from exposure to multiple “traumatic events”.
“Gradual Onset Stress”. Provincial workers are still not entitled to compensation for “gradual onset stress” under the Act.

Federal Workers. There is also no change to the existing policy regarding the adjudication of stress claims made by federal workers under the Government Employees Compensation Act.

Effective Date. The new policy is effective March 25, 2014 so it will apply to all decisions the WCB makes on or after March 25^th.

Employer Costs. It’s difficult to predict whether the new policy will lead to increased costs for employers – but the WCB acknowledges in its report the risk that appeal and legislative decisions could significantly expand the scope of coverage beyond the original intent of its policy. This could, in turn, increase employer costs by increasing assessments, increasing the number of appeals and the related costs to do so, or both.

The WCB issued the new policy after a period of public consultation – and interestingly, on the heels of the Supreme Court of Canada’s March 28, 2014 decision clarifying workers’ compensation criteria for federal government employees covered under the Government Employees Compensation Act. Read McInnes Cooper’s: SCC Clarifies Workers’ Compensation Criteria For Federal Employees.

Click here to read the NS WSB’s new policy: Policy 1.3.9 – Psychological Injury.

Click here to read the NS WSB’s report, “Psychological Injuries: Final Program Policy Decision and Supporting Rationale”.

Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our McInnes Cooper Occupational Health and Safety Team to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.

McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2014. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

NS Workers’ Compensation Board Issues New Policy for Psychological Injury Claims

Published:

Author(s):

Share

Share

Related Lawyers

Michael Murphy

Related Services

Related Industries

Related Publications

5 Key COVID-19 Labour & Employment Litigation Learnings

N.B. Construction Remedies Act: 7 Key Changes from the Mechanics’ Lien Act

Hiring a Foreign Company to Provide Services in Canada? 3 Immigration Issues

3 Legal Tools to Help Foster a Diverse & Inclusive Workplace

Federal OHS Violence & Harassment Prevention: 10 Key Changes January 1, 2021

10 COVID-19 Workplace Vaccination Policy Tips

Dutch Court Orders Corporation to Reduce Emissions in Landmark Decision

The N.S. Shared Solar Energy Program: 3 Key Facts

Tax Implications of Working from Home During COVID-19: 10 Employer FAQs

Atlantic Canada Minimum Wage Increases Effective April 1, 2021

10 Employer FAQs About Employee COVID-19 Testing & Vaccination

Contracting Chaos: 5 Key 2020 Employment Contract Lessons

CCDC 2 (2020): 8 Key Changes to the Stipulated Price Contract

The Indigenous Right to a Moderate Livelihood: A Need for Clarity

Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc.: Cause for Termination Clause Concern

P.E.I. Workplace Harassment Prevention Obligations: 5 Key Regulatory Changes July 1, 2020

Matthews v. Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd.: Employee Bonus Entitlement Lives On

Playing it Safe: Employer Obligations To Employees Working From Home

Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller: One-Sided Standard Form Clauses May Be Unenforceable

Temporary Immigration Measures Make Hiring Temporary Foreign Workers Easier

Coping with COVID-19: Planning for Business Reopening

Coping with COVID-19: The Impact on Contractual Performance in the Energy and Natural Resources Sector

Coping with COVID-19: Employers’ Top 10 Immigration Law FAQs

Coping with COVID-19: New Requirements for Employer Relief

Atlantic Canada Minimum Wage Changes Effective April 1, 2020: More Than Wage Rates

Coping with COVID-19: (More) Employer FAQs

Coping with COVID-19: Employer FAQs

N.S. Battens Down Marine Renewable Energy Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

Prompt Payment Coming Down the Pike in NS: What Owners & Contractors Must Know

Amanda Nash in The Advisor by NLOWE | The Top 10 Employment Contract Terms

5 Key Requirements of Canada’s Federal Environmental Emergency Regulations

Atlantic Canadian Employees’ Rights & Employers’ Obligations at Election Time

5 Key Changes to N.L. OHS Workplace Violence & Harassment Prevention Obligations January 1, 2020

Managing Social Media @ Work: 3 Steps to an Effective Workplace Social Media Policy

5 Basics Every Startup & Growing Business Should Know About Employment Law

Atlantic Canada Minimum Wage Changes Effective April 1, 2019: In Like a Lamb

New N.B. Workplace Anti-Violence & Harassment Obligations April 1, 2019

Webinar | No Joking Matter: Complying with N.B. Workplace Anti-Violence & Harassment Requirements

Immigration Law Compliance: 5 Key Best Practices for Human Resources Professionals

Privacy Interest in Personal Computer Contents: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Ownership Isn’t 9/10 of the Law in R. v. Reeves

Collateral Damage: How Canada’s New Impaired Driving Penalties Will Impact Canadian Immigrants & Employers

10 Burning Employer FAQs About Cannabis @ Work

Webinar | 5 Key Immigration Law Compliance Best Practices for Human Resource Professionals

Sarah McInnes in workplace.ca | The Top 5 Immigration Law Facts Every HR Professional Should Know

No Minimal Impact: Atlantic Canada’s 2018 Minimum Wage Increases

Extended Parental Leave in Atlantic Canada: What to Expect When Your Employee is Expecting

Dan Watt in Energy Regulation Quarterly | The Impact Assessment Act, Canadian Energy Regulator Act and Offshore Energy: A View from Atlantic Canada

The Evolving Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: N.S. Court Recognizes a “Duty of Enforcement Consultation” in R. v. Martin

Webinar | 5 Workplace Policy Areas to Manage Marijuana Risks

No Matter the Chatter, the Bid is the Bottom Line: N.S. Supreme Court Issues a Reminder in CF Construction v. Town of Westville

Medical Marijuana, Residual Impairment & The Duty to Accommodate in Re Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers’ Assn. Inc. and IBEW, Local 1620 (Tizzard)

The Global Talent Stream: 5 Practical Learnings About the Latest Immigration Star

Accommodating Mental Disability: 5 Practical Tips

N.S. Appeal Court puts a Lid on medical Pot: No health plan coverage & no workers compensation benefits in Canadian Elevator Industry Welfare Trust Fund v. Skinner & Skinner v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal)

Webinar | #It’s Time: A 5-Step Sexual Harassment Risk Mitigation Strategy for Employers

More Valuable Than Money? The 5 Most Common Equity Compensation Plans

#It’s Time: A 5-Step Sexual Harassment Risk Mitigation Strategy for Employers

Do Something: General Contractor Liable for Failing to Disclose the Existence of Labour & Materials Bond in Valard Construction Ltd. v. Bird Construction Co.

The Feds Finally Take the Plunge: Bill C-69 & The New Federal Offshore Renewable Energy Regime

Bill C-69 & the New Federal Impact Assessment Act: The Impact on the Role of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB)

Navigating the N.S. Marine Renewable Energy Regime: What Project Developers Need to Know

Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada: Crown Breached Fiduciary Duty to Indigenous Community – in 1858

Be Diligent: 5 Practical Steps to Enforceable Workplace Policies

The Dope on Medical Cannabis Health Benefits: Key Considerations for a Coverage Strategy

How the Pros Get Into Canada: 5 FAQs About the NAFTA Professional Work Permit