June 21, 2018
Lawyers regularly encourage clients to be proactive and discuss potential issues with third parties before they become real problems. But in the case of tenders after closing, this might not be the best policy. On May 23, 2018, the N.S. Supreme Court decided that by rejecting a submitted bid that was compliant on its face based on subsequent communications between the owner and bidder, the owner breached its duty to treat all bidders fairly and equally. The decision in CF Construction v. Town of Westville serves as an effective reminder to both owners and bidders to be wary in engaging in communications with each other about a bid after it has been submitted but before it has been awarded; doing so can be costly to one or both.
In September 2014 the Town of Westville issued a tender call, to which C.F. Construction Limited submitted the lowest bid. The Town, however, received post-bid closing information from CF’s lead estimator which caused the Town to conclude that CF’s lump sum bid price was based on supplying a non-compliant component. In particular, the Town’s engineer called CF to review CF’s bid submission. During that conversation, CF allegedly asked if the Town would entertain the idea of an alternate component to that which was specified in the call for tenders. The Town took from the conversation that CF had priced its bid based on the non-compliant component. Though both witnesses remembered the conversation very differently, the Town relied on that discussion as proof that CF’s bid was non-compliant. A follow-up email from the Town’s engineer to CF asking for clarification and further detail on the non-compliant component led the parties further astray. CF thought this meant the Town was entertaining the idea of an alternate component: however, the Town’s engineer had sent the e-mail to confirm his suspicions that CF’s price was based off a non-compliant component. On this basis, the Town considered it was justified in disqualifying CF’s bid, and awarded the contract to the second lowest bidder. CF sued the Town alleging breach by the Town of the contract formed as a result of the tendering process (Contract A). The N.S. Supreme Court agreed and awarded CF the profit it would have earned had it been properly awarded the contract to do the work (Contract B). CF received $343,745.00 in damages for lost profit.
Compliance at face-value. The Town admitted that when it opened CF’s bid it appeared compliant on its face. It was only through the subsequent communications that the Town grew suspicious, and ultimately awarded the contract to the second lowest bidder. The court decided that the submitted bid was indeed compliant on its face. It was not relevant whether or not CF had priced one of the individual components of its lump sum bid price based on a non-compliant component: Contract A came into existence between the parties when the bid was submitted and CF would have been legally responsible to perform the work in accordance with the specifications in the call for tenders (including the supply of the exact component required in the tender call). Accordingly, the Town breached its duty to treat all bidders fairly and equally.
The court believed the contractor. The Judge ultimately preferred CF’s recollection of the phone call and concluded that CF’s bid price was not based on a non-compliant component. The fact that CF’s lead estimator had procured an estimate for the compliant component from a subcontractor supported this fact. It would defy all logic that CF’s lead estimator had priced their bid based on a non-compliant component for which they had not received an estimate and of which they had no design.
The result would have been the same based on the law, regardless of who the Court believed. However, the Judge confirmed he need not decide the case based on these facts; the law alone was sufficient. In a 2007 Supreme Court of Canada decision, Double N Earthmovers v. Edmonton, the Court decided an owner has no duty – or right – to investigate bids; they must accept bids at face value. Whether the bidder, at the time of tender, is capable of or intends to perform per the tender requirements is irrelevant in light of the bidder’s legal obligation to do so once its bid is accepted. The best way to make sure that all bids receive the same treatment is for an owner to weigh bids on the basis of what is actually in the bid – not subsequent discovered information.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Construction Law Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2018. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Nov 1, 2023
On October 13, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its judicial reference opinion: a significant portion of Canada’s federal…
Sep 29, 2023
On September 21, 2023, Bill C-56, the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act, passed first reading. If passed, the Act will give developers of…
Apr 12, 2023
The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has made it clear that, while the burden is high, pre-emptively vacating or discharging a builders’ lien is a…
Mar 16, 2023
We updated this publication on March 30, 2023. On January 1, 2023, the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians…
May 2, 2022
On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…
Nov 19, 2021
To help realtors better prepare their clients to ensure smooth real estate transactions with timely closings, here are the answers to the 10…
Sep 9, 2021
We udpated this publication on March 7, 2022. The New Brunswick Construction Remedies Act, substantially came into effect on November 1,…
Jan 20, 2021
In the first update to the CCDC 2 since 2008, in December 2020 the Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) published the CCDC 2 (2020).…
Feb 4, 2020
Canada’s construction industry is abuzz with the latest innovation in lien legislation. Prompt payment requirements are being added to…
Feb 21, 2018
On February 15, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada decided a trustee’s fiduciary duty includes an obligation to inform beneficiaries of the…
Dec 18, 2017
The answer to the question, “What’s employers’ rationale for implementing workplace drug and alcohol testing?” is pretty…
Nov 17, 2017
It’s official: as of October 31, 2017, “facilitation payments” contravene Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA).…
Aug 16, 2017
In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…
Apr 28, 2017
On April 24, 2017, the N.S. Government issued regulations that will finally allow the Builders’ Lien Act amendments permitting early release…
Apr 17, 2017
Recreational cannabis isn’t legal yet - but much of the associated stigma is already gone, usage is up and employers are feeling the workplace…
Apr 5, 2017
NOTE: Consultants who were already lobbying and in-house lobbyists already employed by an organization when the new Act took effect were…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Dec 22, 2016
Effective January 1, 2017, the kinds of trusts that can claim the Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) will be limited. Now, the PRE allows…
Dec 19, 2016
On December 14, 2016, Bill 46 and the Newfoundland and Labrador Public Procurement Act became law. The new Act isn’t yet in effect, however,…
Dec 5, 2016
It’s been a long time coming, but Newfoundland and Labrador is finally getting new public procurement legislation. On November 29, 2016, Bill…
Nov 22, 2016
There is an old expression about “selling the Brooklyn Bridge”. Recently, a bankrupt subcontractor attempted to register a lien against the…
Sep 23, 2016
On September 15, 2016, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal clarified the province’s statutory regime governing both the exercise of a lender’s…
Sep 19, 2016
On September 15, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided certain damage to a building under construction was covered under the relevant…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jun 30, 2016
The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…
Jun 20, 2016
Real estate vendors and purchasers have high expectations of their realtors – and they don’t often hesitate to pursue legal action against…
Jun 17, 2016
In its June 16, 2016 decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City), the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s…
May 24, 2016
It’s now certain: in Newfoundland & Labrador, liens can’t be placed on Crown land or holdbacks with the possible exemption allowing for…
May 10, 2016
On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada generally affirmed the common law rule that positive covenants do not run with the land. More…
May 2, 2016
We updated this publication on October 4, 2023. Workplace accidents regularly lead to charges under occupational health and safety (OHS) law.…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Mar 9, 2016
On January 11, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sentenced a front-line supervisor to imprisonment for 3½ years for four counts of…
Jun 25, 2015
We updated this publication on October 4, 2023. Most people know a company itself has occupational health and safety (OHS) obligations and…
May 25, 2015
We updated this publication on July 21, 2022. Every party to a Right of Way has some idea of what that Right of Way is – but many times,…
Mar 3, 2015
Snow can be a big nuisance at this time of year, but snow load - the weight of the snow, usually measured in pounds per square foot - can be…
Dec 1, 2014
The construction industry - project owners, contractors, subcontractors and trades - might be relaxing, ignoring the hype around Canada’s…
Nov 27, 2014
Recently, the NS Court of Appeal confirmed that a union can be certified as the bargaining agent of employees based merely on their dependence…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.