August 15, 2017
Receivers across Canada seeking to sell assets can learn two important lessons about the importance of adhering to the letter of agreements of purchase and sale from a recent decision of the B.C. Court of Appeal. In KPMG Inc. v. 0747825 B.C. Ltd., the receiver learned these lessons the hard way when the Court chose commercial certainty over commercial reality: its failure to provide written notice that a condition had been satisfied, as required by the contract, resulted in losing its breach of contract claim of over $1.2 million – despite the fact the buyer had actual notice the receiver had satisfied the condition on time.
Comply with notice requirements. If the contract requires written notice, then give written notice. Doing so where the buyer has actual notice may seem a superfluous task, especially when both parties just want to conclude the deal. But if the contract requires written notice, giving it can save the receiver millions if the transaction doesn’t close: a court might very well let the buyer walk away from a transaction if the receiver fails to give written notice.
Fully understand agreements before entering them. The Court of Appeal’s comments about commercial certainty show that courts will enforce many other types of contractual provisions –in addition to those regarding notice – so long as they are clear and unambiguous. So a receiver should fully understand an agreement and its requirements before entering into and acting under it.
KPMG was the court-appointed receiver-manager of the assets and undertaking of Carmel Cove Resort & Spa Inc., a lakeside resort in B.C. On October 25, 2013, the receiver accepted the offer of 0747825 B.C. Ltd. to buy Carmel Cove’s business assets for $5.025 million. The contract was subject to a list of conditions and provided that unless “each condition is waived or declared fulfilled by written notice given by the benefiting party to the other party on or before the date specified for each condition, this Contract will be terminated”. The contract specifically included a condition that the Court approve the transaction within 21 days of October 25, 2013. The receiver obtained court approval for the transaction on November 15, 2013 – precisely 21 days after October 25. The buyer, 0747825, sent a representative to the November 15 court hearing, and likely had actual notice as of that date. Yet the receiver failed to deliver written notice to the buyer until November 19, 2013. By November 15, however, the buyer wanted out of the agreement and treated the receiver’s failure to deliver written notice as a termination of the contract. In turn, it refused to tender funds. After the receiver found another purchaser, it brought a breach of contract claim against the original buyer, 0747825, for $1,237,150.96, representing the expenses of maintaining and operating the business assets until it could find another buyer, and the difference in sale price it eventually received. The receiver relied heavily on the fact the buyer had actual notice that the receiver had satisfied the condition, insisting that, under such circumstances, written notice was unnecessary. Neither the trial court nor the Court of Appeal, however, agreed:
Clear Terms. The B.C. Supreme Court’s reasoning is simple: the parties had agreed the contract was null if the receiver failed to give written notice in a timely fashion. The buyer may have had actual notice, but by the contract’s clear and unambiguous terms, such notice was insufficient. Since the receiver failed to deliver written notice by November 15, the contract was terminated as of that date.
Commercial Certainty. The B.C. Court of Appeal agreed and dismissed the receiver’s appeal. The Court of Appeal noted that parties specify how to remove conditions in order to obtain commercial certainty in their agreements: such provisions clarify the parties’ obligations and reduce the risk of litigation. Out of respect for commercial certainty, courts should give effect to such agreements.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2017. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
May 2, 2022
On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…
Aug 5, 2021
On July 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision protecting the status of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) as a…
Oct 5, 2020
On October 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the existence and application of the anti-deprivation rule in Canadian bankruptcy law.…
Jun 12, 2020
The financial technology (Fintech) industry uses technology to support and enhance financial and banking services.
May 11, 2020
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released a much-awaited decision regarding the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). The CCAA is…
Jun 26, 2019
Information disclosure is a key theme that emerges from Canada’s new cannabis regulatory regime: the government wants lots of information from…
May 21, 2019
As of June 13, 2019, private companies incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) must prepare and maintain a register of…
Dec 23, 2017
Parents often threaten their children that if their behaviour did not improve they will get a lump of coal in their Christmas stockings. On…
Dec 22, 2017
Blockchain technology has already been a transformative force in a number of sectors. Its most prominent use to date has been as the…
Nov 20, 2017
October 2, 2017 marked the end of the consultation period relating to the taxation of private corporation proposals the Department of Finance…
Oct 31, 2017
On October 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that a bank that pays out on a fraudulent cheque has the protection of section 20(5)…
Aug 28, 2017
Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor’s bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown’s priority to proceeds…
Aug 16, 2017
In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…
Aug 4, 2017
On July 18, 2017, Canada’s Minister of Finance released proposed changes to the Income Tax Act (Canada) that, if implemented, will mark one of…
Apr 21, 2017
In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…
Nov 22, 2016
On November 17, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada decided a mortgagee has the mortgagor’s implied consent to disclose its discharge statement…
Sep 23, 2016
On September 15, 2016, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal clarified the province’s statutory regime governing both the exercise of a lender’s…
Jun 30, 2016
As of June 25, 2016, provincially regulated workers and employers in Nova Scotia, Quebec, BC and Saskatchewan can participate in Pooled…
Jun 30, 2016
The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…
May 9, 2016
On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that a mortgage imposing a higher interest rate in the event of default and reserving a…
May 5, 2016
Note: As of June 25, 2016, provincially regulated workers and employers in Nova Scotia, Quebec, BC and Saskatchewan can participate in Pooled…
May 2, 2016
Amendments changing the early warning reporting system take effect on May 9, 2016, provided all necessary approvals are obtained (except in…
Oct 19, 2015
Access to sufficient capital to fund operations, research and development, and other costs is a key challenge for start-ups and for some small…
Mar 30, 2015
Hindsight is 20/20. Lawyers can’t always predict the outcome of a legal claim. But when a dispute between an investment client and her…
Apr 29, 2014
Lenders are often faced with a situation where a customer (Borrower) approaches them for funds to complete an acquisition of the shares of a…
Aug 28, 2013
A general security agreement (GSA) is the most common form of personal property security used in the Atlantic Provinces to secure commercial…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.