Team Members ()

Publications ()

News ()

Pages ()

Services ()

  • Our Team

    Our Team

    • Lawyers & Clerks
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Human Resources
    • Marketing & Business Development
    • Paraprofessional Services
  • Our Services

    Our Services

    • Service Areas
      • Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
      • Administrative Law
      • Agribusiness
      • Banking and Financial Services
      • Bankruptcy and Insolvency
      • Business Disputes
      • Business Immigration
      • Class Actions
      • Construction Law
      • Corporate and Business
      • Corporate Finance and Securities
      • Corporate Governance and Compliance
      • Cross-Border Law
      • Education Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Estates and Trusts
      • Foreign Direct Investment
      • Franchise Law
      • Health Law
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property
      • Labour and Employment
      • Litigation
      • Maritime Law
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Municipal Law
      • P3 and Infrastructure
      • Pensions and Benefits
      • Privacy, Data Protection and Cyber Security
      • Public Law
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation of Professions
      • SISIP LTD Allowances Class Action
      • Tax
      • Technology
    • Industries
      • Cannabis
      • Construction & Property Development
      • Energy & Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Government & Institutions
      • Insurance
      • Manufacturing, Processing & Sales
      • Mining
      • Ocean Economy
      • Private Clients
      • Startups & High Growth Companies
      • Technology
    • More Services
      • MC Advisory
      • MC Legal Lab
  • Our Insights
  • Our Firm

    Our Firm

    • Our Values
    • Our History
    • Our Global Reach
    • Our News
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Collective Social Responsibility
    • Environmental Stewardship
    • Pro Bono Program
  • Our Careers

    Our Careers

    • Lawyer Opportunities
    • Business Professional Opportunities
    • Paralegal & Legal Assistant Opportunities
    • Summer Student & Articling Opportunities
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Collective Social Responsibility
  • 1.866.439.6246
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Stay Updated
  • Contact Us
  • LexMundi World Ready
  • Privacy Policy
  • http://linkedin.com
  • http://facebook.com
  • http://twitter.com
  • 1.866.439.6246
Home > Our Insights > Receivers Must Give Written Notice Under Purchase & Sale Contract
Publications

Receivers Must Give Written Notice Under Purchase & Sale Contract

Published:

August 15, 2017

Author(s):

  • Tim McLaughlin

Share

Print

Receivers across Canada seeking to sell assets can learn two important lessons about the importance of adhering to the letter of agreements of purchase and sale from a recent decision of the B.C. Court of Appeal. In KPMG Inc. v. 0747825 B.C. Ltd., the receiver learned these lessons the hard way when the Court chose commercial certainty over commercial reality: its failure to provide written notice that a condition had been satisfied, as required by the contract, resulted in losing its breach of contract claim of over $1.2 million – despite the fact the buyer had actual notice the receiver had satisfied the condition on time.

Comply with notice requirements. If the contract requires written notice, then give written notice. Doing so where the buyer has actual notice may seem a superfluous task, especially when both parties just want to conclude the deal. But if the contract requires written notice, giving it can save the receiver millions if the transaction doesn’t close: a court might very well let the buyer walk away from a transaction if the receiver fails to give written notice.

Fully understand agreements before entering them. The Court of Appeal’s comments about commercial certainty show that courts will enforce many other types of contractual provisions ­–in addition to those regarding notice – so long as they are clear and unambiguous. So a receiver should fully understand an agreement and its requirements before entering into and acting under it. 

KPMG was the court-appointed receiver-manager of the assets and undertaking of Carmel Cove Resort & Spa Inc., a lakeside resort in B.C. On October 25, 2013, the receiver accepted the offer of 0747825 B.C. Ltd. to buy Carmel Cove’s business assets for $5.025 million. The contract was subject to a list of conditions and provided that unless “each condition is waived or declared fulfilled by written notice given by the benefiting party to the other party on or before the date specified for each condition, this Contract will be terminated”. The contract specifically included a condition that the Court approve the transaction within 21 days of October 25, 2013. The receiver obtained court approval for the transaction on November 15, 2013 – precisely 21 days after October 25. The buyer, 0747825, sent a representative to the November 15 court hearing, and likely had actual notice as of that date. Yet the receiver failed to deliver written notice to the buyer until November 19, 2013. By November 15, however, the buyer wanted out of the agreement and treated the receiver’s failure to deliver written notice as a termination of the contract. In turn, it refused to tender funds. After the receiver found another purchaser, it brought a breach of contract claim against the original buyer, 0747825, for $1,237,150.96, representing the expenses of maintaining and operating the business assets until it could find another buyer, and the difference in sale price it eventually received. The receiver relied heavily on the fact the buyer had actual notice that the receiver had satisfied the condition, insisting that, under such circumstances, written notice was unnecessary. Neither the trial court nor the Court of Appeal, however, agreed:

Clear Terms. The B.C. Supreme Court’s reasoning is simple: the parties had agreed the contract was null if the receiver failed to give written notice in a timely fashion. The buyer may have had actual notice, but by the contract’s clear and unambiguous terms, such notice was insufficient. Since the receiver failed to deliver written notice by November 15, the contract was terminated as of that date.

Commercial Certainty. The B.C. Court of Appeal agreed and dismissed the receiver’s appeal. The Court of Appeal noted that parties specify how to remove conditions in order to obtain commercial certainty in their agreements: such provisions clarify the parties’ obligations and reduce the risk of litigation. Out of respect for commercial certainty, courts should give effect to such agreements.


Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.


McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2017. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.

Share

Print
View Related Content

Related Lawyers

  • Tim McLaughlin

    Tim McLaughlin

    Lawyer

Related Services

  • Banking and Financial Services
  • Bankruptcy and Insolvency

Related Industries

  • Financial Services

Related Publications

View All Publications
  • Mortgage Deficiencies: NB Appeal Court Clarifies Use of “Market Value” & More

    May 2, 2022

    On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Court-Ordered CCAA Super-Priority Charge Can Outrank CRA: 5 Key Take-Aways

    Aug 5, 2021

    On July 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision protecting the status of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) as a…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Chandos Construction Ltd. v. Deloitte Restructuring Inc.: Anti-Deprivation Rule Exists in Bankruptcy Law

    Oct 5, 2020

    On October 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the existence and application of the anti-deprivation rule in Canadian bankruptcy law.…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Top 5 Legal Considerations When Launching a FINTECH Startup

    Jun 12, 2020

    The financial technology (Fintech) industry uses technology to support and enhance financial and banking services.

    Read More
    Publications
  • Callidus Capital Corp: Policing CCAA Proceedings

    May 11, 2020

    The Supreme Court of Canada recently released a much-awaited decision regarding the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). The CCAA is…

    Read More
    Publications
  • 5 Key FAQs About Canadian Cannabis Company “Key Investor” Disclosure Requirements

    Jun 26, 2019

    Information disclosure is a key theme that emerges from Canada’s new cannabis regulatory regime: the government wants lots of information from…

    Read More
    Publications
  • “Register for Individuals with Significant Control”: 5 Key Facts CBCA Corporations Need to Know to Comply

    May 21, 2019

    As of June 13, 2019, private companies incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) must prepare and maintain a register of…

    Read More
    Publications
  • A Lump of Coal for Christmas: Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Auditor Negligent & Liable for $40 Million in Livent v. Deloitte

    Dec 23, 2017

    Parents often threaten their children that if their behaviour did not improve they will get a lump of coal in their Christmas stockings. On…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Is cryptocurrency the right tool for your company to raise capital? 5 FAQs about Initial Coin Offerings (ICO)

    Dec 22, 2017

    Blockchain technology has already been a transformative force in a number of sectors. Its most prominent use to date has been as the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Canada’s Private Corporation Tax Proposals: Year End Planning in the Face of Uncertainty

    Nov 20, 2017

    October 2, 2017 marked the end of the consultation period relating to the taxation of private corporation proposals the Department of Finance…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Supreme Court of Canada Confirms Cashing Banks Continue to Bear the Biggest Risk of Fraudulent Cheques in Teva Canada Ltd. v. TD Canada Trust

    Oct 31, 2017

    On October 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that a bank that pays out on a fraudulent cheque has the protection of section 20(5)…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Federal Crown’s Deemed Trust Priority for Unremitted GST/HST Survives Bankruptcy

    Aug 28, 2017

    Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor’s bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown’s priority to proceeds…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Cross-Border Caution: 5 Anti-Corruption Law Compliance Program Tips

    Aug 16, 2017

    In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Proposed Changes to Business Income Tax Rules: A Gamechanger for Private Business Owners

    Aug 4, 2017

    On July 18, 2017, Canada’s Minister of Finance released proposed changes to the Income Tax Act (Canada) that, if implemented, will mark one of…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Estate Planning in the Age of Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID)

    Apr 21, 2017

    In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Supreme Court of Canada Warns Judgment Creditors: Implied Consent is Enough to Disclose Discharge Statement in Royal Bank of Canada v. Trang

    Nov 22, 2016

    On November 17, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada decided a mortgagee has the mortgagor’s implied consent to disclose its discharge statement…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NB Court Clarifies Mortgage Lenders’ Rights on Default: 5 Steps for NB Mortgage Lenders to Consider

    Sep 23, 2016

    On September 15, 2016, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal clarified the province’s statutory regime governing both the exercise of a lender’s…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NS Dives into Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPP)

    Jun 30, 2016

    As of June 25, 2016, provincially regulated workers and employers in Nova Scotia, Quebec, BC and Saskatchewan can participate in Pooled…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Common Ground: Retail & Commercial Condominium Financing

    Jun 30, 2016

    The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…

    Read More
    Publications
  • A Penalty by Any Other Name: Supreme Court of Canada Says Interest Rate Increase Triggered by Default, Whatever It’s Called, Infringes the Interest Act in Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co.

    May 9, 2016

    On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that a mortgage imposing a higher interest rate in the event of default and reserving a…

    Read More
    Publications
  • NS Poised to Take the Plunge into Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs)

    May 5, 2016

    Note: As of June 25, 2016, provincially regulated workers and employers in Nova Scotia, Quebec, BC and Saskatchewan can participate in Pooled…

    Read More
    Publications
  • New Early Warning Reporting System Exemptions for Certain Securities Lending Arrangements Effective May 9, 2016

    May 2, 2016

    Amendments changing the early warning reporting system take effect on May 9, 2016, provided all necessary approvals are obtained (except in…

    Read More
    Publications
  • New Kid on the Block: Crowdfunding Joins Traditional Equity-Based Funding Options for Startups & SMEs

    Oct 19, 2015

    Access to sufficient capital to fund operations, research and development, and other costs is a key challenge for start-ups and for some small…

    Read More
    Publications
  • The Value of Hindsight – 3 Steps to Help Financial Advisors Avoid Client Claims and Complaints

    Mar 30, 2015

    Hindsight is 20/20. Lawyers can’t always predict the outcome of a legal claim. But when a dispute between an investment client and her…

    Read More
    Publications
  • Legal Update: Share Purchase Transactions – Tips For Lenders

    Apr 29, 2014

    Lenders are often faced with a situation where a customer (Borrower) approaches them for funds to complete an acquisition of the shares of a…

    Read More
    Publications
  • General Security Agreements – Tips and Traps

    Aug 28, 2013

    A general security agreement (GSA) is the most common form of personal property security used in the Atlantic Provinces to secure commercial…

    Read More
    Publications

Stay Updated

Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.

Connect With Us:
  • Follow us on Twitter @mcinnescooper
  • Like us on Facebook @mcinnescooperlaw
  • Join us on LinkedIn @mcinnes-cooper
  • 1.866.439.6246
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright © 2022 — McInnes Cooper
Lex Mundi Logo MC Advisory Logo