Accounting Firms – Do they need to be registered under the Securities Act?
May 6, 2011
Accounting firms that provide mergers and acquisitions advisory services and corporate finance services should be aware of the implications of recent developments in Canadian securities laws – changes to registration rules that became fully effective in the fall of 2010.
In 2009, Canadian securities regulators introduced changes to the rules relating to securities “registration”. These rules determine who is required to be registered under the securities laws to “trade” in securities. If your firm acts as an advisor to clients buying or selling shares of a business, or if your firm provides assistance to businesses in raising capital, you should be aware of these new rules.
Prior to these developments, the need to register was based on the type of transaction in question. Therefore parties involved in a private market transaction – the sale of shares in a privately-held company, or raising equity funds on behalf of a private company – could be fairly confident that registration was not a requirement to carry out these activities.
The new rules, however, require a firm (and individuals acting on its behalf) to register if they are engaged in, or hold themselves out as being engaged in, the business of trading securities.
The securities law defines “trading” very broadly. The definition covers not just the simple act of selling or issuing a security, but captures any activity in furtherance of that activity. For examples, if a seller of a security were to trade that security, the seller’s advisor or agent could likewise be treated as trading that same security. Therefore, except for limited exceptions, professional advisors to those parties who are buying or selling securities in private markets could be caught by the new registration regime and be required to register as “exempt market dealers”.
Neither have the securities regulators provided much guidance as to what constitutes being “in the business” of trading securities and there is no “bright line” that we can point to as clearly showing when registration is or is not required.
We can, however, surmise that repetition or regularity is an important element of the equation. If a firm undertakes these activities on a regular basis, it is more likely to be considered to be “in the business”.
Other factors to take into consideration are:
• Compensation – Consider if the party is being specifically compensated for advice or assistance in connection with a trade.
• Making a Market – Consider if the party is intermediating a trade between the buyer and seller, i.e acting as a broker.
• Incidental Activities – Consider if the trading activities are the primary focus of the services rendered or are merely incidental to a broader service offering.
As noted above, there is no bright line test to determine if registration is required. We liken the determination to a continuum, where activities that clearly require registration are on one end and activities that clearly are outside the scope of registration are at the other. These are the easy cases; however, most firms will likely fall into the middle of the spectrum where it will be more difficult to determine if registration is required.
It should be noted that the registration requirement applies to those who are holding themselves out as engaging in the business of trading in securities – so, even in the absence of actual activity in this area, merely advertising these services could mean that a firm is required to register.
As the rules are currently formulated, we believe that there is real risk that accounting firms that either
i) advise clients on the purchase and sale of businesses, if the sale is structured as a share sale, and ii) assist clients in raising funds by selling securities, could be considered to be in the business of trading in securities.
The details of the registration process are beyond the scope of this newsletter, but exempt market dealer registration imposes certain financial disclosure obligations and ongoing education and compliance obligations; therefore registration should not be considered a “one time” event. Accounting firms should also be aware that there are ongoing regulatory and administrative obligations accompanying their registration.
In response to the perceived shortcoming of the rules, proposed amendments to the registration regime (if adopted) will likely make it less likely that a pure advisory service (advising clients on the purchase or sale of shares of a business) will be caught by the registration rules. We still believe that activities related to a purchase and sale of a business, such as acting as an intermediary or broker on a transaction, may potentially be caught by the registration requirement. Certain other services, such as assisting clients in raising equity capital, will require close scrutiny to determine registration requirements.
These amendments to the registration rules are scheduled to come into force in July of this year.
- Share with others
- Stay informed with our legal updates by subscribing.